Revitalizing Economics After the Crash

Signatures 2336 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 47 › »

1. 51
   Name: Neel Chamilall on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Luigi Marengo on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Giorgio Fagiolo on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Professor Jack Barbalet on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Michael Nuwer on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Harro Maas on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments: ... even though the profession of economics is changing over the past decades as well.

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Juliet Schor on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: William Dixon on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Alex Rosenberg on Sep 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Amitava Krishna Dutt on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Prof. Bryan Snyder on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Felix Rauschmayer on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: With respect to the next crises to come (climate, ecosystem services), it is the blindness of economists to the dependency of human systems on ecosystems that is one major reason for it.

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Elina Berghäll on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: ALEXIS DANTAS on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Andrea Pacella on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Maeve Powlick on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: Economics is about how we make a living. We address questions that matter to people - many of whom are out of a job right now.

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Peter B. Meyer on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: The pioneers of mathematical economics and econometrics, some of whom were m yprofessors, never lost sight of the limits of their findings. It is the subsequent generations of economists who abandoned analysis of models to belief in them.

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Roland Koenigsgruber on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Duncan K Foley on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Scott Carter on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: Absolutely agree!

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Erik Stam on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: João Queirós on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Roger L. Albin on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Boegenhold, Dieter on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: João Furtado on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Noemi Levy on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: It is urgent to make a change in economicc teaching

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Lonnie Golden on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Giulia Felice on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Duncan Wigan on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Leonardo Burlamaqui on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Richard Weston on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Richard B. Norgaard on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: PhD, Economics, University of Chicago, 1971

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Kurt Bayer on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: Not a very strong text, but anyhow.......

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Subhes Bhattacharyya on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: I fully endorse the above view. Mindless application of mathematical relationships and lack of appreciation of the reality have discredited the field. There is an urgent need for change.

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Christoph Schroeter-Schlaack on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Dirk Kohnert on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Stefan Humer on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Daniel W. Bromley on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Phil Neisser on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Ozlem Onaran on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Michael D. Cohen on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Rudy Fichtenbaum on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Will Hutton on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Alan Cibils on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Robert Chernomas on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Dr. Emanuela Todeva on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: I would recommend the revitalisation to start with an attempt to embrace institutionalism and alienation theory - looking at socially embedded strategic behaviour in the context of politically negotiated institutional frames and irreconcilable contradictions that generate alienation at multiple levels.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Elliott Sclar on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments: The idea that we are scholars who study the economy, rather than students of a dumbed down version of math-physics is not new, but putting in vogue has been a very long time coming. Thorstein Veblen is smiling somewhere (if of course he is anywhere).

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Bjørn-Ivar Davidsen on Sep 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 47 › »