Signatures 2336 total
-
1
Name: Geoffrey M Hodgson on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: John Foster on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Denise E Dollimore on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Andrea Roventini on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Pavel Luksha on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Francesca Gagliardi on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Hulya Dagdeviren on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Zoran Aralica on Sep 11, 2009Comments: Excellent idea, I hope that the campaign have lots of supporters here in Eastern European Countries.Flag
-
9
Name: Edith Kuiper on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Erik Stubkjær on Sep 11, 2009Comments: Sincerely agreeFlag
-
11
Name: Rolf Czeskleba-Dupont on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Jean-François Sattin on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Roberto Scazzieri on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Ping Chen on Sep 11, 2009Comments: Not only the blind trust of rationality and market is wrong, the fancy math models to justify these beliefs are also wrong! Frisch model is a perpetual motion machine, Lucas model of microfoundations is representative agent in nature, which against the Principle of Large Numbers. Black-Schole model is explosive in nature. Applied mathematician in economics and finance often ignored basic constraints in physics, ecology, and history.Flag
-
15
Name: GAZIER on Sep 11, 2009Comments: It is important that economists carefully examine their blindness and its sources.Flag
-
16
Name: Paulo Furquim De Azevedo on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Barry Smith on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: AGUADO, Ricardo on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Caren Grown on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Erkki Kilpinen on Sep 11, 2009Comments: Country: Sweden for 2009-10, otherwise FinlandFlag
-
21
Name: Mritiunjoy Mohanty on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Cristina MATOS on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Lorenzo Zirulia on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Maria Csanadi on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Miguel Ramirez on Sep 11, 2009Comments: thanks for contacting me about this.Flag
-
26
Name: Lennart Erixon on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Fiona Wishlade on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Erica Schoenberger on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Antti Gronow on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Fiona Wishlade on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Peter Skott on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Peter Skott on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Robert Skidelsky on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Alfred Kleinknecht on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Garlato Guglielmo on Sep 11, 2009Comments: I totally agree with what has been taken from Paul Krugman contribution. There is a need to go further in order to explain why economists are so prone to accept the dogmas of neoclassical economics.Flag
-
36
Name: Roberto Veneziani on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Frédéric Morand on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Nick Winder on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Per Ove Eikeland on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Nina Banks on Sep 11, 2009Comments: Political Economist do, however, have theories that were able to predict the current crisis.Flag
-
41
Name: Ana Maria Bianchi on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Walter Oetsch on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: MANUEL GONZALEZ-LOPEZ on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Michael Ellman on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Barbara Hopkins on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Renee Prendergast on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Sinyutin Mikhail on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: David Gindis on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Mark Lorenzen on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Stephanie Kelton on Sep 11, 2009Comments:Flag