Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 445 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 9 »

  1. 1
    Name: Marc Beaumont on Feb 18, 2010
    Comments: I think you all are doing a great job. Keep up the good work.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Wayne Norris on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Tod Hanson on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Brian D Parker on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Katherine Tipton on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Allan Worthington on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Charles Jett on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: William C. Morris on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments: There is a better alternative.
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Terry Ponder on Feb 19, 2010
    Comments: Historically, the tolls on these things go up dramatically over the years. Plus, it is an eyesore and creates noise in the neighborhoods. Someone is on the take here. This plan does not make sense. There are better plans out there but they don't want them as some people are benefitting financially under the table now and in the future.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Tracy Calamas on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Elton B Stephens Jr on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Kim Cook on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Scott Cook on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Terry Smith on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Paula Smith on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments: Thank you for fighting against this monstrosity and for making a way to have our voices heard!
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Janet Wood on Feb 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Philip A. Morris on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: Let's have improved movement in the corridor without devaluing adjacent residential and business areas. ReThink280's urban expressway proposal will accomplish just that.
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Philippa Straus on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: We do not want an elevated roadway anywhere near our residential areas. We believe the environmental impact studies the state is NOT doing would clearly show this to be an ill conceived and environmentally damaging project. We do not want our dwindling state tax dollars wasted on planning for and construction of a toll road that we do not want. What a great deal: they use our tax dollars to plan it and then ask us to spend our after-tax dollars to drive on it. Only in Alabama. And by the way, what happens when all ten lanes funnel into three at the cut-through Red Mountain to get into downtown? Think ship-in-a-bottle. All those cars on all those lanes; basically slowed to a crawl each and every morning as they must all merge (think highway construction projects... only permanent) into three. We do not want this ill conceived and hastily proposed disaster of a roadway.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: G. Pickens on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: As a downtown business owner and 280 neighbor I am glad to see the "Rethink 280"/Kulash plan! My family sacrificed -paying too much- for less house, to be closer to our business, which employees numerous folks. In fact... almost ALL my neighbors are ALSO local business owners. Like them, we CAN move our business, with us, to a new community, if our current community is destroyed, as super highways are notorious for doing to neighborhoods. In other words... running off business owners, means running off businesses. Who would that benefit? Commuters, keep this in mind when you scream; "just do anything, and do it now!"  Will we someday lament; "Yes... there used to be nice old historic neighborhoods close to a working downtown business area... but now... sadly, both are ruined."? Better to think about it ALL now, than to regret ALL later!
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Richard D Glasgow on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: A resident of Mountain Brook and former resident of Homewood, I travel seven miles each way on U.S.280 between home and work. I am strongly opposed to the current ALDOT expansion plan, and strongly favor a version anticipating increased mass transit, both bus and eventually light rail.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: Serious consideration should be given to the alternative proposal put forth by ReThink 280 before any decision on reworking 280 is made.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Clay Simmons on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: Aldot's U. S. 280 plan must be changed to a more thought out plan. This hurried action appears to be politically driven not rationally planned.
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Catherine Armstrong on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Nancy Worthington on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Keith Richards on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: THERE HAS A TO BE A BETTER SOLUTION.
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Clifford M. Spencer, Jr. on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Elisabeth C. Brower on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Jane C. Gillespy on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Ashley Spotswood on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Laura Stansell on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: I hope that ALDOT will give the alternate plan being proposed serious consideration. It would be a shame to ignore a less expensive plan that would give the same results.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Marjorie L. White on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Sidney And Margie Davis on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Cathy Adams on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Linda David on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments: Accomodating traffic while disregarding cost and people, while destroying communities needing preservation; the present expansion plan makes no sense.
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Naneita L. Cobbs on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Eunie McDavid on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Kristen Murphree on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Anne Johnson on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Mary M. Bledsoe on Feb 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Thomas G Lamkin on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments: I have thought for years that ReThik280's idea is the way 280 should have been done in the first place. it is still not too late to do it right. Overpasses and under passes as at Pumphouse Road, Hollywood Blvd, Shades Creek Parkway are already in place. Look at the cloverleaf in Homewood. If not for the traffic light at the Shell Station it is still functioning well after 70 years despite much higher traffic counts. Add some frontage road and a few bridges and 280 would be great to Alex City! (And probably for less than an elevated toll road from 459 to Oak Mountain. Think Big folks!
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Elna Brendel on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments: Please look at the alternate plan for fixing Highway 280. An elevated highway is not the answer for the surrounding communities or for my drinking water. I am very much against an elevated highway. Like many of the highways in Alabama, an elevated one will not solve the problem in the long term. Thank you!
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Elna Brendel on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments: Please look at the alternate plan for fixing Highway 280. An elevated highway is not the answer for the surrounding communities or for my drinking water. I am very much against an elevated highway. Like many of the highways in Alabama, an elevated one will not solve the problem in the long term. Thank you!
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Becky Keyes on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Angela Comfort on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Daniel Riviere on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Margaret Cobbs on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Carolyn W. Long on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Grant R. Haines on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments: My family vehemently opposes ALDOTs 280 Expansion Project. Residents of Homewood and surrounding local communities considered its long developed beauty, air and water quality, proximity to Downtown Birmingham, and its local commerce and industry when making the cost/benefit decision to pay the premium often required in these historic areas. ALDOTs 280 project will greatly diminish each of these attributes for those who also made conscious decisions to purchase larger, newer homes in outlying communities. Less intrusive and costly alternatives MUST be considered.
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Richard Bares on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments: Rethink 280 is a must. Why would anyone, in this economic climate, spend an extra $400 million for a solution that is not what the majority of the people want. this is a perfect example of big business (concrete companies, asphalt companies, engineering companies) driving for a solution for their own benefit. We need to stop them. Thanks for organizing this grass roots effort.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2010
    Comments: Carpooling? Public transportation? Maybe, live closer to where you work? Hello? Why not fund education and ride to work with your neighbor.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 9 »

Sponsored links