REMOVE THE POTRERO HILL PROJECTS IMMEDIATELY

Signatures 73 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 51
   Name: Fabien Lannoye on Jan 6, 2009

   Comments: The projects are run down, inefficient housing, poor use of the site. Everybody has to gain from removing the existing housing and turning this area into better housing for all income brackets.

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Elliott Roberts on Jan 25, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Love on Mar 30, 2009

   Comments: all projects need to removed around the us that cause 75% of the neighborhoods crimes

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Jeremy Kelley on Apr 17, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Anonymous on May 15, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Raquel on May 17, 2009

    Comments: i want these projects to get removed cause i always here gun shots and my son hassed bin rob

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Anonymous on May 31, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Tyler Roach on Jun 6, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Garth Spiller on Jul 13, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 19, 2009

    Comments: They are dangerous to the community and for those who live there, especially since most of them are boarded up, inviting crime and wrongdoing.

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Daniel Bacon on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments: I lived on Potrero Hill for 25 years and was once vice-president of the Potrero Boosters Nieghborhood Association. According to Captain Richard Holder, past police captain of the south east district, 80% of the crime on Potrero Hill is perpetrated by residents of the two public housing projects on the hill. These ghetto-like projects are incubators of illegal activity which is harmful to the law-abiding residents of the projects themselves as well as the entire neighborhood. They must be torn down and replaced by mix-income housing owned as much as possible by the residents.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 9, 2009

    Comments: Responsibility for 80%+ of the crime (according to SFPD records) is not acceptable. Also, the state of those projects is deplorable and an embarrassment to SF. Most importantly, those (law-abiding) residents of the projects should have a decent place to live...

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Michael Fox on Aug 9, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 11, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Rodney Williams on Aug 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Michael Soon on Sep 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 12, 2009

    Comments: Remove the projects they are detrimental to the community.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2