Signatures 427 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 9 › »
-
151
Name: Ryan Weis on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: K Williams on Jan 1, 2009Comments: NASA can and should be an important part of the U.S. manufacturing & scientific infrastructure. You need a visionary scientist to head NASA and eliminate as much dead wood and fraud as possible. Through NASA, the USA can become truly Great again.Flag
-
153
Name: Janet Seymour on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Bill Quillinan on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: Alicia Hunter on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
156
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
157
Name: Alicia Hunter on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
158
Name: Nick Valiante on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Fire this guy now.Flag
-
159
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
160
Name: David Levitt on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
161
Name: Rhonda Dossenbach on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
162
Name: Sylvia Baker on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Definitely remove. No fiscal responsibility demonstrated by Mr. Griffin that I can see.Flag
-
163
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments: We need Change!Flag
-
164
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Please remove this parody of a scientific administrator from his post. Sooner, rather than later. Thanks, C UsseryFlag
-
165
Name: Robert Watkins on Jan 1, 2009Comments: another bush flunky. got to go now.Flag
-
166
Name: Jim Poston on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
167
Name: MICHELLE PETERSON on Jan 1, 2009Comments: HEY MRS. GRIFFIN, WHERE ARE THE PETITIONS FOR THE THOUSANDS OF AUTO WORKERS & SUPPLIERS WHO HAVE LOST, AND CONTINUE TO LOSE THEIR JOBS ARE YOU AFRAID OF HAVING TO LIVE ON ONE INCOME SOME OF US HAVE NONE, THROUGH NO FAULT OF OUR OWN!!!! IS YOUR FAMILY MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANY OF OURSFlag
-
168
Name: Aaron Oesterle on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
169
Name: GretaR on Jan 1, 2009Comments: This is a no brainer...cut him loose!Flag
-
170
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
171
Name: John Hamlyn on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Yes! He must go now.Flag
-
172
Name: Jay Hardesty on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
173
Name: Carol Boucher on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
174
Name: Robert Livesey on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Let science be science and keep politics away from the process.Flag
-
175
Name: Eileen Sanders on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Please appoint someone with inspiration and a can-do attitude to this position.Flag
-
176
Name: David Welch on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
177
Name: Ken Hunter on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Mr. Griffin runs NASA as if he owns the agency. His steadfastness to retire the shuttle is ridiculous. The United States can not rely on the Soviet Union to power our space program. Get rid of this pompous ass NOW!Flag
-
178
Name: Ali Kinkhabwala on Jan 1, 2009Comments: I was previously an astronomer and former recipient of NASA funding in the past. Mike Griffin simply should not be allowed to retain his post.Flag
-
179
Name: John Goldstone on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
180
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Purge the mfFlag
-
181
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Purge the mfFlag
-
182
Name: Pamela Heath on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Our space program is falling behind both in its goals and technology. We need a real scientist in charge.Flag
-
183
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
185
Name: Paul Raines on Jan 1, 2009Comments: The 2008 election was about change. Deal with it.Flag
-
186
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
187
Name: Richard Gudnitz on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
188
Name: Steve Morgan on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Get rid the the bum!Flag
-
189
Name: Jim Wilson on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Time for new blood at NASA.Flag
-
190
Name: Michael Gatro on Jan 1, 2009Comments: This guy is a joke, and has done more damage to NASA then ever before.Flag
-
191
Name: Praveen Chandra on Jan 1, 2009Comments: He should be removed for all of the above. He is incompetent and anyone that has to beg to be retained should not be savedFlag
-
192
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments: Get rid of this global warming denier now, please!Flag
-
193
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
194
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
195
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: James J. Burke on Jan 1, 2009Comments: It seems Griffin is more interested in his own agenda and own job security than the national space agenda and the security of our astronauts.Flag
-
197
Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2009Comments: He was insubordinate and needs to be replaced.Flag
-
198
Name: George Ford on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
199
Name: Karen Daly on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
200
Name: Samuel Perry on Jan 1, 2009Comments:Flag