Signatures 38 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Peggy L. Okins on Jun 26, 2008Comments: This is more fascist legislation that harms more kids than it protects since there are kids on sex offender registries and the children of former offenders are also impacted. Plus, most SO's have committed non-violent crimes like urinating in public. These deceptive laws should never be implemented because no-one benefits from them except career-oriented politicians.Flag
- 2
-
3
Name: Derek Logue on Jun 26, 2008Comments: The real purpose of this law is to try to silence former offenders who speak out against counterproductive sex offender lawsFlag
-
4
Name: Thomas Erickson on Jul 7, 2008Comments: Children should be the ones kept from the internet not grown men or women just because they are sex offenders . Protecting children starts with the parents not the government or LAW that infringe on constitutional rights .Flag
- 5
-
6
Name: David Muir on Jul 7, 2008Comments: These laws do not protect children as they are designed. Laws need to be inacted for a convicted Sex Offender that no threat to children.Flag
-
7
Name: Anonymous on Jul 7, 2008Comments: It is obvious that all or our laws are in dire need of reform. This is what happens when we as a society do not excercise our rights. Our Laws and Law enforcement need to be better utilized to serve a greater cause, not pettiness.Flag
-
8
Name: Carrie on Jul 7, 2008Comments: Once again, more laws that do nothing but give parents a false sense of security while isolating an entire segment of society. Parents need to monitor their childrens' activity online, not the government. Due to the already-severe restrictions, which make it difficult for people on the SOR to find jobs, the internet might be their only way to find gainful employment.Flag
-
9
Name: Emili Culp on Jul 8, 2008Comments: According to the definitions in this proposed bill, RSOs can be banned from using sites such as eBay. They must contact the Registry every time they want to log on to a new site to so much as post a question on the proper way to install a door!--and if they fail to do this, they can be thrown in prison!!! Whatever happened to due process Probable Cause Needing a Search Warrant Another Outrageous Law to persecute the favorite Political Target du jour.Flag
-
10
Name: Jim Culp on Jul 8, 2008Comments: S-431 is blatantly unconstitutional!!!!! When will the paranoia end!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Flag
- 11
-
12
Name: Judy Culp on Jul 9, 2008Comments: S-431 should absolutely be TOTALLY rejected!!! This is overly broad, vague, and not fair to former sex offenders who paid their dues, turned their lives around, and are law abiding, productive members of society. This unjust, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and limits the time police, sheriffs, etc. have to keep track of the truly dangerous predators. REJECT S-431 PLEASE!!!!!Flag
-
13
Name: Pat VanDensen on Jul 9, 2008Comments: This is a terrible law that will do nothing to protect us from violent sexual predators, but only overburden an already impossibly burdened system. We need a national registry for violent sex offenders, but this is a bad law that will hurt many people and accomplish nothing.Flag
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
20
Name: Lisa Risler on Jul 13, 2008Comments: Please, PLEASE include the low-risk and no risk sex offenders like my son Eric www.changingthelaw.com -- he's in prison for CHATTING -- consensual chat - never met her and never attempted it! Come on - not all sex offenders ARE sex offenders!!! Please consider this!Flag
-
21
Name: Cathy Cannon on Jul 13, 2008Comments: Our lawmakers need to consider taking all of the nonviolent, nonpredatory offenders off of the registry as well. These laws punish who are not a danger or threat to society.Flag
-
22
Name: Vickie on Jul 13, 2008Comments: This is a great petition, however, it would be even better if it included "no risk" offenders. Anyone who really thinks that the gestapo vigilante tactics of monitoring the internet useage of no-risk, low-risk, offenders is going to keep their children safe has been sold a 'lie'. This law is a violation of the Constitutional rights of the thousands of law abiding sex offenders who are wanting nothing more than to have the opportunity to move on with their lives!Flag
-
23
Name: Kevin McDonald on Jul 14, 2008Comments: Stop promoting dumb laws that play on false fears and mythologies. Focus your energies on preventing child abuse and punishing those who *truly* deserve to be punished.Flag
- 24
-
25
Name: Karen Piercy on Jul 17, 2008Comments: Wake up America! We must VOTE the Idiots out of office! That's how to save our children,our families,our lives! The laws are flawed!!!Flag
-
26
Name: Debra Takacs on Jul 19, 2008Comments: This is another example of over reaching legislation! This is of little or no benefit in efforts to monitor the high risk offenders. This is another way of putting all offenders under the same umbrella even if they are low risk.Flag
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
-
35
Name: Gina Consiglio on Aug 26, 2008Comments: These laws are ludicrous! Murderers are treated better !Flag
-
36
Name: GARY THOMPSON on Sep 21, 2008Comments: Everyone can change their lives if that is their intention. Those that have serious issues that pose a threat to society due to the persons lack of control of his impulses would be better off in a structured environment free from temptation and the daily struggle to survive in an oppressive society that can make life unbearableFlag
- 37
- 38
Page: 1