Reject proposal for camping & caravan site on St Columbs Road

Signatures 170 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 1
   Name: Adrian Mc Auley on Nov 1, 2012

   Comments: Say NO to the campsite.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Nolene on Nov 1, 2012

   Comments: Protect the park.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Dave on Nov 1, 2012

   Comments: Fully support this.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Joseph P. Davies on Nov 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2012

   Comments: Oppose

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Paul Howie on Nov 2, 2012

   Comments: I as a resident of the Limavady Road oppose the caravan park and campsite proposal as it will ruin our local area and amenities

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Frank McCoy on Nov 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Fahed Fallaha on Nov 2, 2012

   Comments: Any one who visits St Columbs Park can see that this proposal will have a detrimental visual impact, increase noise and worsen an already bad traffic management problem.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2012

   Comments: Absolutely ridiculous to consider a caravan park in this vacinity for all the reasons mentioned.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Ann on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: Keep up the fight

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Siobhan Murphy on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Don And Heather McClay on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: An astoundingly inappropriate proposal - beggars belief!!!

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Sean Baker on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: Destroying the area in the name of tourism

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Poppy McAuley on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Tracey Campbell on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Annette Kelly on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Jodie McAuley on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Rory Campbell on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Katherine McCandless on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: The Ebrington site and St Columb's Park area should be retained for the residents, not for a few caravanners (or whoever) who might spend a night here while passsing through on their way to somewhere else. The integrity of the entire complex should be preserved at all costs, as should measures to ease rather than increase traffic flows in the area - the caravan park proposals would only damage that aspiration.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Greg Deacon on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: disgrace,

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Jillmcfaul on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: against this

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Lesleyann Connor on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Morris Forbes on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: I strongly oppose this ludicrous proposal.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Kirsty on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: Unbelieveable, as a Rates payer I strongly object to this proposal , surely the cost of maintenance of this project would be better spent on improving services in the area which have suffered from cutbacks in the past few years. Why spoil an area of natural beauty and cause further disruption to local residents.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Peter on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: Why did Derry City Council not consult with residents first, something to hide I guess!!

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Majella Doherty on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: No end to the traffic nightmare

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anon on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: the council are acting like bullies

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Kevin on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Isabel McNally on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: H Faulkner on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: George Mc Nally on Nov 2, 2012

    Comments: An undesirable project in an unsuitable area.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Super-Duper blog! I am loving it!! Will come back again. I am taking your feeds also where find cheaper buy wow gold on crazyraid.com where find cheaper buy wow gold on crazyraid.com

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Hi, after reading this remarkable paragraph i am also cheerful to share my experience here with friends. World of warcraft Gold Store World of warcraft Gold Store

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Paula Taylor on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Greenpeace on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Protect the environment

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Sean McLaugnlin on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: I'm not from the waterside but I am against this proposed development, shame on derry council

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Alan on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: The council will do anything to destroy the waterside and protect the cityside

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: NO To Travellers Site on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: We know what you're really at!

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Waterside Man on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Save the park

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: June Fields on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: i am totally against this proposal to have a caravan site near St Columbs park .The Peace bridge has brought more than it's share of increased traffic so I dread to think what a caravan camp site would do to the area.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anon on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Why are the political representatives not defending the park and waterside?

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: John on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: It would better if the council tried to sort out the traffic and parking instead of wanting to develop a "halting site"

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: PJ Deeny on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Good to see some people care

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Damien Bryce on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: Hope you stop this crazy project

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anon on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: No on Nov 3, 2012

    Comments: No way

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »