they actually listened and committed to the changes we asked for. im honestly floored that we pulled this off but we need to stay sharp and make sure they follow through on the new direction.
June 4, 2007
Final supporters
We, the undersigned Landmark graduates, stand for a breakthrough in the conversation of transformation through the reform and renewal of the curriculum, organization, and methodologies of Landmark Education. The reforms at the core of this renewal cover the following interrelated issues and actions:
1. A substantial reduction in regular course time devoted to guest invitation and related conversations, including time used for conversations regarding the virtues of Landmark Education and transformation - providing more course time for additional distinctions, coaching, sharing, and other exercises and activities.
2. Allowing the results embodied in Landmark graduates, the education itself, and the intention of graduates to speak for the organization and for transformation - reducing reliance on invitation to introduction structures.
3. Creating commitment and sensitivity at all levels of the organization to a positive, respectful experience for current and potential participants - balancing statistical and numerical measures of performance (for seminar leaders, introduction leaders, ILP participants and others) with measures of the quality of participant experience.
4. Taking measures to ensure that course registration efforts do not create negative impressions, perceptions of pressure, or otherwise turn off significant numbers of prospective participants to the conversation of transformation.
5. A commitment to transparency and openness, including openness to criticism, openness to straightforward and public discussion of all aspects of Landmark, its history, and other transformational methodologies, as well as greater transparency into Landmark ownership, decision making, and financial information - openness also to graduate-led reforms such as these, and to changes in Landmark leadership itself if leadership serves as an obstacle to positive reform.
Landmark methodology too often creates a negative impression among those who interact with the organization or its participants, unnecessarily inhibiting Landmark's effectiveness in spreading transformation to the broad, global community. Having observed these fundamental obstacles to widespread acceptance and participation in the conversation of transformation, and seeing and standing in the power and possibility of renewal, I add my name to those calling for reform by signing below:
Updates
Reached 100 supporters
May 18, 2007
6 Comments
Finally someone said it. I stopped inviting my friends because the pressure was just too much and it felt like I was being a salesman instead of sharing something real.
WAY too much time spent on talking about the intro sessions. I paid to learn stuff, not to spend half the time recruiting strangers.
Its about time. The courses should stand on their own without the constant push for guest events.
I hope they listen. The way the registration stuff is handled is honestly super off-putting and makes people think its a cult.
The focus on numbers really ruined the experience for me. Can we just get back to the actual coaching and tools?
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
they actually listened and committed to the changes we asked for. im honestly floored that we pulled this off but we need to stay sharp and make sure they follow through on the new direction.
June 4, 2007
Final supporters
We, the undersigned Landmark graduates, stand for a breakthrough in the conversation of transformation through the reform and renewal of the curriculum, organization, and methodologies of Landmark Education. The reforms at the core of this renewal cover the following interrelated issues and actions:
1. A substantial reduction in regular course time devoted to guest invitation and related conversations, including time used for conversations regarding the virtues of Landmark Education and transformation - providing more course time for additional distinctions, coaching, sharing, and other exercises and activities.
2. Allowing the results embodied in Landmark graduates, the education itself, and the intention of graduates to speak for the organization and for transformation - reducing reliance on invitation to introduction structures.
3. Creating commitment and sensitivity at all levels of the organization to a positive, respectful experience for current and potential participants - balancing statistical and numerical measures of performance (for seminar leaders, introduction leaders, ILP participants and others) with measures of the quality of participant experience.
4. Taking measures to ensure that course registration efforts do not create negative impressions, perceptions of pressure, or otherwise turn off significant numbers of prospective participants to the conversation of transformation.
5. A commitment to transparency and openness, including openness to criticism, openness to straightforward and public discussion of all aspects of Landmark, its history, and other transformational methodologies, as well as greater transparency into Landmark ownership, decision making, and financial information - openness also to graduate-led reforms such as these, and to changes in Landmark leadership itself if leadership serves as an obstacle to positive reform.
Landmark methodology too often creates a negative impression among those who interact with the organization or its participants, unnecessarily inhibiting Landmark's effectiveness in spreading transformation to the broad, global community. Having observed these fundamental obstacles to widespread acceptance and participation in the conversation of transformation, and seeing and standing in the power and possibility of renewal, I add my name to those calling for reform by signing below:
Updates
Reached 100 supporters
May 18, 2007
6 Comments
Good luck with this. Hope they actually change things so people dont feel like they are being pressured all the time.
Finally someone said it. I stopped inviting my friends because the pressure was just too much and it felt like I was being a salesman instead of sharing something real.
WAY too much time spent on talking about the intro sessions. I paid to learn stuff, not to spend half the time recruiting strangers.
Its about time. The courses should stand on their own without the constant push for guest events.
I hope they listen. The way the registration stuff is handled is honestly super off-putting and makes people think its a cult.
The focus on numbers really ruined the experience for me. Can we just get back to the actual coaching and tools?
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Good luck with this. Hope they actually change things so people dont feel like they are being pressured all the time.