Contact Orders UK Family Courts

Signatures 434 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 6, 7, 8, 9

1. 401
   Name: Phillip Wright on Jun 2, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 402
   Name: Barbara Crosby on Jun 2, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 403
   Name: Colin Marshall on Jun 2, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 404
   Name: Paul Stead on Jun 2, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 405
   Name: Lynda Culbertson on Jun 2, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 406
   Name: Guy Harrison on Jun 2, 2004

   Comments: Why dose the Government not learn, we will not go away until we have equil access to our children

   Flag
7. 407
   Name: Kate Chambers on Jun 3, 2004

   Comments: this is very important

   Flag
8. 408
   Name: Nigel Simmons on Jun 3, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 409
   Name: EKANAYAKE AMBANPOLA on Jun 3, 2004

   Comments: Hope this will be an eye opener!

   Flag
10. 410
    Name: James Latona on Jun 3, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 411
    Name: Michael Hall on Jun 3, 2004

    Comments: I agree whole heartedly with this campaign

    Flag
12. 412
    Name: Brenda Molloy on Jun 3, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 413
    Name: Yassin Dickie on Jun 3, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 414
    Name: Patricia Johnson on Jun 4, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 415
    Name: Brian Johnson on Jun 4, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 416
    Name: Mel Roche-Newton on Jun 8, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 417
    Name: RAYMOND ORR on Jun 9, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 418
    Name: Nigel Chambers on Jun 19, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 419
    Name: Charles Adams on Sep 2, 2004

    Comments: reform can only be to grant automatic and equal access for the child to both parents and families....otherwise there will be a continuation of this and a waste of family money and a lining of the legal pockets of the courts and solicitors

    Flag
20. 420
    Name: Shaun Hughes on Sep 4, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 421
    Name: Sharon Metssitane on Nov 23, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 422
    Name: Carly Greenfield on Dec 1, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 423
    Name: Danny Howcroft on Dec 22, 2004

    Comments: How can the state take away a childs right to see his father in the name of the law

    Flag
24. 424
    Name: Paul Spanner on Jul 4, 2005

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 425
    Name: Sameir Jalal on Oct 4, 2005

    Comments: I am a father that is suffering this and have had not contact with my childrenf for over a year now. This is infact harassment and goading by the resident parent

    Flag
26. 426
    Name: Miguel Bernuy Mogollon on Nov 16, 2005

    Comments: el programa me parece muy bueno

    Flag
27. 427
    Name: Paul Bowles on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 428
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 429
    Name: Steve Coleman on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: The "family courts" themselves violate the law. Then we are told by the government our only recourse is to go "back to the family courts" How easy for these people to destroy wonderful relationships between a father and child. How long would THEY tolerate this occuring with them and their child The entire process is a violation of basic human and constitutional rights. Parents find they must spend all they have to see their children and these are the parents kept away by the "family" courts, that the children need.

    Flag
30. 430
    Name: Travis Cooper on Jun 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 431
    Name: Niasher Saunders on Jan 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 432
    Name: Niasher Saunders on Jan 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 433
    Name: Alison Hoffman,Cook on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments: I don't care where in the world one is because the "Best Interest of the Child"should be upheld nomatter what country your in! I hope this helps your cause because it should if anybody truely cares about the children. The principle of the "Best Interest of the Child" means that a child must not be the victim of conflicts between his/her parents,and the child's interests must not be confused with those of the child's parents or extended family! Please keep in touch

    Flag
34. 434
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 3, 2008

    Comments: I,the undersigned, ask the Government to recognise the flouting of contact orders to be an act of harassment against the non-resident parent under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Further that contact orders be made with notice that denial of contact will be met with either non-punitive or punitive action or both.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 6, 7, 8, 9