Contact Orders UK Family Courts

Signatures 434 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 9 › »

1. 151
   Name: Colin Nunn on May 22, 2004

   Comments: If the father ignores a court directive all hell is broke loose, while the mother can basically do anything without repercussion. This is so very wrong and needs to change in this alleged civilised world.

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: George Forbes on May 22, 2004

   Comments: I think it is a disgrace the way men and fathers are treated in this country.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Philip Lewis on May 22, 2004

   Comments: I am not a father but this issue affects ALL of us. After all we have to walk streets increasingly populated with unruly fatherless children!

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: THOMAS BROOK on May 22, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Ian Barltrop on May 23, 2004

   Comments: The government are failing protect the rights of the non-resident parents, which also infringes their right to a family life under the ECHR.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Michael Oliver on May 24, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Julian Abbott on May 24, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Timo Blake on May 24, 2004

   Comments: Contact orders must be enforced, currently about 50% of all contact ordered are flouted. 40% of seperated father lose all contact with their children within 2 yrs (LCD figures).

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Rebecca Kingdom-Kruszewski on May 24, 2004

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Dominic Kent on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Tom McCorry on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Gregory Pogonowski on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Karen Randall on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Wayne Melville on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Andrew Flanagan on May 24, 2004

    Comments: I am not a parent, but I fully support this movement.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Elizabeth Arbuthnot on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Khusro Karim on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Stephen MacAllan on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: MARK BOTTERILL on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Douglas Lancaster on May 24, 2004

    Comments: I applaud your petition, and personally consider violations of custody orders (when they are willfull - mostly the case) to be not just crimes of harassment, but hate crimes. Everyone knows the motivation behind them and the devasting effect on the children of the world.

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: John Baker on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Tim Staddon on May 24, 2004

    Comments: As a man I'm sick to death of the criminal justice system thinking it's funny or harmless, or poetic, for men to be victims of sexual discrimination or harrassment.

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Cheryl Houkes on May 24, 2004

    Comments: The law is an ass, particularly where fathers are concerned. Give them the rights that a mother enjoys - in the world of equality, it's the right thing to do.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Derek Whitbread on May 24, 2004

    Comments: Too many non-resident parents and their children are being deprived of a loving relationship because the resident parent is above the law. How many children in years to come will be suing the legal system because it let them down

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Harriet Blake on May 24, 2004

    Comments: children need fathers to just coz and an ex is a prat to you dont mean he will be to his kids

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Kevin MacDonald on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Shalin Tandon on May 24, 2004

    Comments: Not only is the non-enforcement of Contact Orders by the secretive UK Family Courts harassment against the non-resident parent but a wholesale abuse of the rights of the child to know both his parents, and contrary to merely the lip-service paid to the statement in the 1989 Children Act "in the best interests of the child". It is entirely perverse that a Resident parent (mainly mothers)can be sent to jail for not paying her tv license fee as well as allowing her children off school for no good reason (and as a result UK national truancy rates have fallen)but no action is effected against her if she deliberately and willfully removes a non-resident parent(mainly fathers)from a child`s life, bringing the legal system into disrepute. Who will respect a legal system that fails to enforce its own Orders Disgraceful!!!

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Harry Singer on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Giovanni Levi on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Layton Bevan on May 24, 2004

    Comments: our group will do all it can to help, good luck

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: John Kelly on May 24, 2004

    Comments: Sadly none of my local MP's have signed the early day motion !

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Kenneth Robertson on May 24, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Robert Sambrook on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Bryan Saunders on May 25, 2004

    Comments: Where there is prejudice and injustice, it must be addressed at the highest, and every level.

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: John Campbell on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Nicola Wallwin on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Nick Wallwin on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Aisha Carrim on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Caroline Crawford on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Neil MacGregor on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Nick Blount on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Sebastian Barber on May 25, 2004

    Comments: an equal world yeah, right.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Nicola Wright on May 25, 2004

    Comments: Children are the most important and unless there is a safety issue they need the love and support of both parents. More work needs to be done with divided families to ensure the emotional wellbeing of children.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Samantha Macquire on May 25, 2004

    Comments: although divorce does happen and some parents cut off contact with the child it shouldn't affect the rights of parents who want contact and the ex is making it difficult.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Natasha Forse on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: JON RUBEN on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Suzy Shankland on May 25, 2004

    Comments: For real justice.

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Ian Fletcher on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Worth Quarrie on May 25, 2004

    Comments: just enforec the will of the courts

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Edward Gorecki on May 25, 2004

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 9 › »