Signatures 47 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Larry Powell on Mar 21, 2008Comments: We must learn from the mistakes of the past. Further loss of our precious forest resource in this day and age must surely be a departure from any ecological wisdom we should have acquired by now. Please revers this unfortunate development!Flag
-
2
Name: Boyd Solnes on Mar 21, 2008Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Ardythe Basham on Mar 21, 2008Comments: Has anyone calculated the value of standing trees as part of a healthy forest ecosystem That is the real bottom line. We are selling our trees too cheaply.Flag
-
4
Name: Scott Harrison on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Nathan Zahn on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Keith Smith on Mar 22, 2008Comments: I live in B.C. but used to live in MB. I recall the "fringes" of poplar trees designed to hide the clear cutting along #10 highway. In these days of environmental concerns we need all the trees we can leaveFlag
-
7
Name: Paul Richcoon on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Mar 22, 2008Comments: Save our trees. We need them to filter out the pollution in our environment.Flag
-
9
Name: Guy St. Godard on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: David Nickarz on Mar 22, 2008Comments: Go Log in hell.Flag
-
11
Name: Jaimee Dupont on Mar 22, 2008Comments: I encourage Tembec to continue recycling paper instead of cutting down new trees.Flag
-
12
Name: Stephanie Chartrand on Mar 22, 2008Comments: Please STOP!Flag
-
13
Name: Jonathan Gabor on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Anonymous on Mar 22, 2008Comments: It's way past too late for making economic decisions that ignore environmental cost. It's all coming home to roost.Flag
-
15
Name: Dwayne Crowe on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Nicole Lahaie on Mar 22, 2008Comments: The world is facing an environmental crisis. To go back to environmentally destructive habits is a huge step forward. Everyone should be doing their best to protect our planet, at any cost!!Flag
-
17
Name: Cindy Murray on Mar 22, 2008Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Kristian Enright on Mar 22, 2008Comments: Trees are vital if even in a mere aesthetic sense, a kind of sculpture over vast time, and to think of them as pure resource is not enough in order to revalidate the conception of nature as our emergent cause.Flag
-
19
Name: Amanda Kinden on Mar 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Amanda Kinden on Mar 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Alon Weinberg on Mar 23, 2008Comments: Why on earth is virgin forest cheaper than recycling paper when we already waste too much. Tembec's environmental greenwash is done, and its reputation nearly ruined. it is a company of the past, not the future, if it persists in this course....Flag
-
22
Name: Dennis Carlson on Mar 23, 2008Comments: It's always about the money rather than what's best for our world. There's probably enough paper around to recycle so we wouldn't have to cut a tree for years.Flag
-
23
Name: Kevin & Anita Miller on Mar 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Angela Bedolfe on Mar 23, 2008Comments: This horrible idolatry of $ isrepellent! We all need to do our utmost to revere the planet as a blessing from our Maker, & be efficient stewards with the future in mind. There are far too many horrors happening because of insatiable avarice, reckless destruction & contamination of habitats for the sake of quick wealth. (The tar/oil sands are a major egregious example.) Trees help provide us w' the oxygen we & other living creatures breathe, supply ffood, medicines, shelter. I love venturing into forests, where my wonder & joy in Nature increases.Flag
-
25
Name: M.J. Harrison on Mar 23, 2008Comments: Money,money, money! Is that all that Tembec can care aboutFlag
-
26
Name: Andrew Basham on Mar 24, 2008Comments: Export-oriented forestry is unsustainable. Clearcutting is unsustainable. And our cities are unsustainable. It is time to redesign our economic, social, and political systems to recognize, respect, and learn from ecological wisdom - a form of "ecomimicry". See the Institute for Science IN Society (www.i-sis.org.uk) for important scientific information on how to create sustainable societies.Flag
-
27
Name: Tammela Bobick on Mar 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Liz Dykman on Mar 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Clare Powell on Mar 25, 2008Comments: I now live in Saskatchewan, but I was born and raised in Manitoba. I am outraged at this action by Tembec. It is one more obsecenity by an unfeeling corporation which prefers to make profits at the expense of our environment.Flag
-
30
Name: Richard Quinton on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2008Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Carolyn Peterson on Mar 31, 2008Comments: The current way of logging is not clean, not responsible, not sustainable. I've witnessed the blatant pollution (eg: oil slicks in mud and puddles) and loss of old-growth timber, and CANNOT SUPPORT THIS MOVE!Flag
-
33
Name: Amanda Egan on Mar 31, 2008Comments: I am extremely disappointed with this decision. I understand that recycling is not always as economically efficient, but the environmental costs in this case far outweigh any monetary considerations. I will no longer purchase newspapers as I don't want to contribute to this problem.Flag
-
34
Name: Anonymous on Mar 31, 2008Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Jessica Wachal on Apr 1, 2008Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Sherri Powell on Apr 2, 2008Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Carla Sbert on Apr 2, 2008Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Liz Dykman on Apr 2, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Apr 3, 2008Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Ashleigh Dewar on Apr 4, 2008Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Jason Valen on Apr 4, 2008Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Jaime Bird on Apr 4, 2008Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Krystal Lee Jackiw on Apr 4, 2008Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Apr 4, 2008Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Nicole Dewar on Apr 5, 2008Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Clint Roscoe on Sep 2, 2008Comments:Flag
Page: 1