Signatures 332 total
-
1
Name: Annette Kittredge on Jun 17, 2007Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Graham Hudson on Jun 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Richard Mitchell on Jun 19, 2007Comments: Most people in the village use the surgery so what need is there for a pharmacy - I travel from Horndean to this surgery and it is excellent to close it would be deprimental in the health care offered in the area. R MitchellFlag
-
4
Name: Jeremy Buttery on Jun 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Steve Barker on Jun 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Wendy Stafford on Jun 20, 2007Comments: I agree with the above statement. I have always found the dispensing service at Rowlands Castle surgery to be excellent. Rowlands Castle surgery is invaluable for the health services it provides for the local community.Flag
-
7
Name: Wendy Stafford on Jun 20, 2007Comments: I agree with the above statement. I have always found the dispensing service at Rowlands Castle surgery to be excellent. Rowlands Castle surgery is invaluable for the health services it provides for the local community.Flag
-
8
Name: Robyn Laker on Jun 21, 2007Comments: I am on permanent medication and the dispensary at Rowlands castle provides a vitla, high qulaity and convenient service which I need to use on a regular basis. I am opposed to the proposed pharmacy as I understand it would lead to the loss of the dispensary service and would also reduce the doctor and nurse services (which I also need to use on a regular basis).Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2007Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Susan Snowden on Jun 23, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Linda Donaldson on Jun 24, 2007Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Rebecca Morgan on Jun 24, 2007Comments: The service we have received from Rowlands Castle Surgery, since moving to the area 2 years ago, has been outstanding and the integral dispensary has been a crucial part of that service.Flag
-
13
Name: Thomas Morgan on Jun 24, 2007Comments: We use a number of repeat prescription items for our children. The smooth running of the surgery and its dispensary, has been great in terms of reducing the number of trips we have to make.Flag
-
14
Name: Kathleen McCartney on Jun 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Pamela C Winn on Jun 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: John Butt on Jun 25, 2007Comments: Current arrangements are entirely satisfactory, and should not be prejudiced.Flag
-
17
Name: T Cozens-thompson on Jun 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Sue Griffin on Jun 26, 2007Comments: The surgery offers an excellent service, so why change what is already working. I want to keep a service I can trust.Flag
-
19
Name: Stephanie Griffin on Jun 26, 2007Comments: The system works really well, we do not want another pharmacy in the village.Flag
-
20
Name: Bernard.griffin@solent.ac.uk on Jun 26, 2007Comments: I have been using this surgery for 18 years, the service provided is excellent, I see no reason for a pharmacy to open in the village.Flag
-
21
Name: Janice Creighton on Jun 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Andrew Cooper on Jun 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Julie Oliver on Jun 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: John Anderson on Jun 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Louisa Anderson on Jun 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Claire Cooper on Jun 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Andrew Cooper on Jun 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2007Comments: pharmacy not needed as services available in surgery or MorrisonsFlag
-
29
Name: Mrs J De Laporte on Jun 27, 2007Comments: I am very happy with the service provided by Rowland's Castle SurgeryFlag
-
30
Name: Michael Upfield on Jun 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Andrew Nichol on Jun 28, 2007Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Alastair Nichol on Jun 28, 2007Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Leslie Young on Jun 28, 2007Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2007Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Sara Tier on Jun 28, 2007Comments: I feel the possible loss of surgery services is far more important than the small benefit that a pharmacy could bring to the villageFlag
-
36
Name: Geoff & Angela Lambert on Jun 28, 2007Comments: It works - don't break it!Flag
-
37
Name: J Handscomb on Jun 28, 2007Comments: There is no need for a Pharmacy in the Village, the Sugery facilities are suffcient. The village would not sustain the buisiness and i would soon close leaving us with nothing!Flag
-
38
Name: Heather Beckett on Jun 28, 2007Comments: The proposed application would threaten the extremely valuable medical service provided in Rowlands Castle, which requires ongoing use of its useful services additional to 'traditional medical services' in order to remain a viable business.Flag
-
39
Name: Heather Beckett on Jun 28, 2007Comments: The proposed application would threaten the extremely valuable medical service provided in Rowlands Castle, which requires ongoing use of its useful services additional to 'traditional medical services' in order to remain a viable business.Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2007Comments: I do not believe a pharmacy will offer significant benefits to the village when compared to the loss of exisitng services which are provided in more suitable & appropriate surroundings.Flag
-
41
Name: J M Hardiman on Jun 28, 2007Comments: The proposed application would threaten the extremely valuable medical service provided in Rowlands Castle, which requires ongoing use of its useful services additional to 'traditional medical services' in order to remain a viable business and service.Flag
-
42
Name: Tristan Button on Jun 28, 2007Comments: The proposed application would threaten the extremely valuable medical service provided in Rowlands Castle, which requires ongoing use of its useful services additional to 'traditional medical services' in order to remain a viable business and service.Flag
-
43
Name: William G.A.Ager on Jun 28, 2007Comments: It's just as unwelcome now as was the previous attempt in recent years. The applicant should seek a location which has need of a pharmacy.Flag
-
44
Name: William G.A.Ager on Jun 28, 2007Comments: It's just as unwelcome now as was the previous attempt in recent years. The applicant should seek a location which has need of a pharmacy.Flag
-
45
Name: Raymond Cox on Jun 28, 2007Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Andrew Riddle on Jun 28, 2007Comments: I do not see the need for yet another dispensing Chemist in the area as we already have several in the local areaone namely in Horndean, Clanfield, cowplain,havant , Given my own medication these pharnacies do not hold a particulary good stock.Flag
-
47
Name: Nicola Riddle on Jun 28, 2007Comments: I feel this application will impact on the provision of medical services provided by the local Doctors surgery. I think it is more important to have minor ailment scheme and a nurse practitioner available to the village via their doctors surgery than to loose this service for the sake of another local pharmacyFlag
-
48
Name: Nigel Bowers on Jun 29, 2007Comments: Just say NO!Flag
-
49
Name: Jacqueline Oliver JP on Jun 29, 2007Comments: The dispensary within Rowlands Castle surgery has always given a comprehensive service. In fact the overall service I have experienced at the surgery has been highly caring and organised. The provision of pharmacy services within the local area is excellent and I can see no need for this to be added to at this time. The loss of certain services at Rowlands Castle would be a blow to local residents, many of whom are elderly, and would mean that patients would have to travel to be treated or to obtain some services. I cannot see how this would improve the lives of patients.Flag
-
50
Name: Rachel Harding on Jun 29, 2007Comments:Flag