Qimage for Mac

Signatures 236 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 1
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments: it could be a killer app on my Mac !

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Paul Inskip on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments: A great piece of software that is sorely missed on a mac.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: F V/d Zanden on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Fabrizio on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments: i hope to see as soon possibile a version for Mac !

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Jason Hicking on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments: I use ImagePrint commercially on the Mac but would love an alternative solution with the quality I've heard all the Qimage users raving about. Please port this to the Mac.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: David White on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: David Schultz on Oct 30, 2006

   Comments: Have license from old PC days...would love to see Qimage on a Mac platform. Have a G5 so boot camp is not an option for me.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Mark Oakland on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments: Yep and if it did so, the mac photo world would be immeasurably improved.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Shreyas Chandaria on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Brendan Mendenhall on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Robert Bitticks on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments: I LOVE Qimage, but I've recently switched to Mac. Sending files back to my Dell laptop for printing is doable but extremely bothersome. If there's a sufficient market for a Mac version, hopefully that will provide resources. Thanks.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: M Forte on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments: Since I queried the developer a few months ago about a port, I'll definitely sign.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Robert Johnson on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments: Qimage is the only reason I keep a old PC around anymore, porting this program to the Mac platform would be the last piece of the puzzle for me, I think it should have been developed on the Mac to start with, Mac has always been the preference for most professional photographers and printers!!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2006

    Comments: I like Qimage on my PC, but hate WINDOWS. Sinice I switched to a MAC PowerBook a year ago, I do miss using Qimage. I'll buy the MAC versio in a heartbeat when it's available.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: JIM BRIDGER on Oct 31, 2006

    Comments: PLEASE MAC

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Dan Wells on Nov 1, 2006

    Comments: Even though you can run Windoze on a Mac, it is expensive for just one program (Parallels costs $70, plus $150 for Windoze itself). This puts Qimage for a Mac user (assuming they don't need Windoze for anything else) at a bit over $300...

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Andrew Sia on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: It was an incredible program for windows. Would love to see it's quality on a mac!

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Jake B. on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: I bought Qimage for PC, and would buy a second licence for the mac. There's no way I'm going to use it under Parallels/boot camp.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Nick Taylor-Delahoy on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: The only reason I have a PC in the house is to run Qimage :-(

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Fons Rademakers on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: It is absolutely amazing that there is nothing equivalent to QImage for the Mac. QImage is really outstanding and it would be a huge asset to have it natively on the Mac. I had to install Parallels, WinXP, printer sharing, etc. just to run QImage on the Mac, but life could be so much simpler and better with a native port.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Howard Bernstein on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: Mike, I've been a longtime user of Qimage. But when I went to the Mac a few years ago nothing has come close. I'm now operating off of an intel based Mac, but even that isn't the solution. I'm running Parallels on my computer and, yes, I can utilize Windows. However, printer support is spotty at best. I've got a new HP Photosmart Pro B9180 printer but can't get it to work in the Windows environment via Parallels. Yes, I realize that the Mac segment is small as far as computer users are concerned. However, most graphic artists and professional photographers have long realized the benefits of the Mac OS. Qimage could own the printing marked on Mac systems. Additionally, if Qimage could work as a plug in with Aperture I believe your program would own the professional photographic printing business. It would certainly be a win-win for Mac OS users and DDI software. Please consider writing a Mac based program. Thanks for considering, Howard Bernstein

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Joe Colson on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: Mike, Qimage is simply the best printing app available. There is nothing similar for the Mac. I'm a long time Qimage user and hope that this is a petition that you will consider. Thanks for the best printing app on the Web.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Steve on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: I am a current\licensed Qimage owner on the Windows platform - I would simply LOVE to see this program ported to the Mac.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: would love to have Qimage available for the Mac OS

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Elbert Paxman on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: very anxious to see a mac version

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Jon on Nov 2, 2006

    Comments: Hi, mac switchers are growing with the new intel imacs. Hope you will make a mac version. Jon

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Jim on Nov 3, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Doyle Yoder on Nov 3, 2006

    Comments: We need a Mac version bad! Please

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Dick Fellows on Nov 3, 2006

    Comments: Sure would appreciate a Qimage app that would work on my Mac.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Dennis on Nov 3, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 4, 2006

    Comments: Looking forward to using Qimage once it's released for Mac.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 4, 2006

    Comments: Long overdue !!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Lisa Osta on Nov 5, 2006

    Comments: Qimage wld be great on a Mac!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2006

    Comments: With the current MacOS, I don't understand why Mike sticks so tightly to Windows. Please! Have a look!

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Lloyd O'Daniel on Nov 6, 2006

    Comments: I've been a Qimage user for quite some time, and now have upgraded to Studio. I am seriously considering a switch back to Mac (1986-1992) because of the mess MS is creating with Vista. I really hate to give up Qimage! I would certainly pay for another license to have a native Mac version.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Jack Pohler on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Terry Martin on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Richard Holbrook on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: Please! Producing great prints on my personal computer is one of the primary reasons I've gone digital.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Jcomley on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: Puhleease!

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Stefano Corda on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Massimo Gallina on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: Bhu

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Marco Marchettini on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: i tried the software under xp and it's great!!! please make an OSX version!!!

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »