| # | Name | What is your university affiliation? | Comments |
|---|
| 201 | Robert Stephens | | |
| 202 | Kenny Gartner | Undergraduate Student | |
| 203 | William Bechhoefer FAIA | Professor Emeritus of Architecture | |
| 204 | Jessica Turner | researcher for a union with a stake in the labor deals struck in the East Campus devel. project | |
| 205 | Michael Weppner | Alumnus | |
| 206 | Aaron Springer | None | |
| 207 | A.E. Griffith | None | |
| 208 | Daniel Ney | Home Owner in College Park | I would prefer a route that also runs parallel to RT 1 briefly near the current downtown and new east campus areas.
Although it may slow some thru commuter car traffic it would make the area much nicer to live and get around |
| 209 | Tim Morris | alumni | |
| 210 | Matt Daddio | Alumni | |
| 211 | Brooke Wortham | faculty | Any location other than campus drive would be a travesty and would not support good design, a flag ship university, and a better town-gown and regional relationship |
| 212 | Will Sprecher | | |
| 213 | Maureen Vosmek | graduate student | |
| 214 | Dave Roselle | Student | |
| 215 | Christina Collins | | |
| 216 | Anonymous | tar heel fan | |
| 217 | Michael Lancaster | student | |
| 218 | Danny Rogers | | |
| 219 | Andy Ballard | Graduate Student | |
| 220 | Brooke Hester | graduate student | |
| 221 | Matt Dernoga | student | |
| 222 | Matt Smith | Faculty | Campus drive is the sensible way to go. |
| 223 | Matt Stern | Student | I've seen presentations from both sides now, and one is supported by lots of facts, the other by assumptions. Campus drive, it is. |
| 224 | Anonymous | student | |
| 225 | Hellmut Lotz | Alumni | I appreciate why some are concerned about routing the Purple Line on Campus Drive but it is really the only route that will maximize the number of riders.
It is too bad that the Green Line does not stop on campus. Lets not repeat previous mistakes by banning the Purple Line to the periphery of campus.
Having lived in many European cities, I have experienced first hand how well light rail fits into the heart of cities. It's been tried and tested. Lets do it on Campus Drive. |
| 226 | Anonymous | | |
| 227 | Justin Fair | Student | |
| 228 | Anonymous | undergraduate | |
| 229 | Natalia Cuadra | Undergrad | |
| 230 | Lisa Eaker | faculty | |
| 231 | Ramin Nafisi | student | |
| 232 | Mark | staff | |
| 233 | Sean O'Neill | Student | |
| 234 | C P Aubry | Staff - also live within one mile | Any other alignment would defeat the whole purpose of the Purple Line (connecting points of density coherently for mass transit users) and endanger its likelihood of being constructed. |
| 235 | Carissa Liro-Hudson | University of Maryland | |
| 236 | Jennifer | | |
| 237 | Josh Bennett | Alumnus | |
| 238 | Michael Harrison | Spouse of faculty member | |
| 239 | Sumner A Handy | student; President of the Residence Hall Association | In addition to a personal preference for the Purple Line and for the Campus Drive Alignment, specifically, I am echoing the sentiments of the RHA, who voted in favor of the Campus Drive Alignment. |
| 240 | Dana Nau | Professor | |
| 241 | Philip Jones | Graduate student | |
| 242 | Kirsten Crase | Graduate Student | I'm strongly opposed to the damage the Preinkert Drive alignment would cause to both the environmental and historical environment of the south side of campus. Furthermore, the Campus Drive alignment makes more sense in general because it is centrally located on campus. |
| 243 | Liz Aukamp | Neighbor | |
| 244 | Adam Fuchs | graduate student | |
| 245 | Megan Fitzgerald | graduate student | |
| 246 | Kathryn Ellison | | |
| 247 | Scott Kisker | | |
| 248 | Anonymous | staff | |
| 249 | Stephanie Stullich | Not affiliated; College Park city councilmember | |
| 250 | Bob Schnabel | | |