Signatures 348 total
-
1
Name: Maria Rutenburg on Dec 11, 2012Comments: I represent "Homeowners United for Planning and Building reform" in San Mateo County. One Bay Area Plan/ Plan Bay Area is going to be hugely detrimental to the local economy and property rights of the people of San Mateo County. MTC-ABAG must be stopped.Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Christopher J Pareja on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Leland And Mary Stanley on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Donna Martinez on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Valera Fooksman on Dec 12, 2012Comments: The One Bay Area plan must be stoppedFlag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Kevin Daniel on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Your plan stinks!!!Flag
-
11
Name: D. Randy Riggs on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: James Sencenbaugh on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Lloyd Pittman on Dec 12, 2012Comments: This process is deceptive, dishonest, and the entire premise is flawed beyond repair. As a stanch supporter of fair affordable housing for all I am deeply disappointed in the special interests that have injected themselves into this process for their own personal gain.Flag
-
14
Name: Victor Goodrum on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Edward Sattler on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Stuart Chappell on Dec 12, 2012Comments: This process limits public input by by limiting the public involved. Not only by arbitrary time limits but arbitrary locations and total time for public revi4e3w and comment.Flag
-
17
Name: Sara Volking on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Frederick Volking Jr. on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: John Fabbro on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Our government is supposed to be government of the people, by the people, for the people - noit an entity unto itself.Flag
-
20
Name: Anne Krysiak on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Svetlana Shaknovich on Dec 12, 2012Comments: the housing they are planning is going to be golden to the taxpayers, let's stop this nonsense before it is too lateFlag
-
22
Name: Thomas Daly on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Margot Boteler on Dec 12, 2012Comments: This needs to be done fairly and not deceptively. And the format needs to be changed.Flag
-
24
Name: Margarita Colin on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Eugene Fouxman on Dec 12, 2012Comments: One Bay Area plan is a socialism in action, it will cost way more than the benefit it will even give while providing a huge opportunity for governmental waste and corruptionFlag
-
26
Name: Wrockwel@sbcglobal.net on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Andy And Kerry Patterson on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Please leave our property rights alone. We have been responsible Americans and don't need interference from people who do not OWN OUR PROPERTY, especially those who would tell us how to live. This country is NOT SOCIALISTIC, as some would or want to think.Flag
-
28
Name: Lorna Moglia on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Honest, robust discussions with public should not be downsized!!!Flag
-
29
Name: Judy Galletti on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Don Barich on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Judy Galletti on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Patrick Ryan on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Verlayne Cave on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Patt & Ken Brown on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Earl Burris on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Richard Hunter on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012Comments: There definitely needs to be more open presentations and more actual public exchange sessions in more than 3 places. There should be county wide meetings at least with all local city council members in attendance. they are woefully uninformed about what is happening and making truly irrational decisions.Flag
-
39
Name: Jo Ann Arneson on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Three meetings in the Bay Area are not enough. No one should need to travel more than 10 miles.Flag
-
40
Name: Patrick T. Peterson on Dec 12, 2012Comments: I attended the Santa Clara visioning session in 2012, and watched all or partially a couple others on video. I fully agree with this petition's statements. If anything, this petition understates that perniciousness of the MTC-ABAG process for coming up with "public opinion."Flag
-
41
Name: Deborah Garneau on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Amy Chorney on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Janet Maiorana on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Commissioners must insist that city councils inform citizens about what is going on. The fact that the majority of citizens have no clue means that what you are proposing is wrong. If it were the right action, you would not be afraid of full disclosure.Flag
-
44
Name: Joan Frasson-Sudmann on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Vince Maiorana on Dec 12, 2012Comments: I am opposed to the state mandates. In Americal each community should dictate their own development. Regional entitites should not be part of development in different communitiesFlag
-
46
Name: Pamela Grant on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Colleen Britton on Dec 12, 2012Comments: Taxpayers are not effectively represented in this whole process.Flag
-
48
Name: Christine Certo on Dec 12, 2012Comments: You need to be more up-front instead of so deceptive!Flag
-
49
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Michael Harkleroad on Dec 12, 2012Comments:Flag