Signatures 349 total
-
1
Name: Pradeep E on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Stop this action immediately. Cubbon Park is a public place which belongs to us the Citizens and no government can take away from us what belongs to us.Flag
-
2
Name: Deepa Mohan on Nov 28, 2009Comments: I believe that public spaces SHOULD be public spaces and not restricted in any way, especially when there are less and less of them.Flag
-
3
Name: Arundhati Raja on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Susan Philip on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2009Comments: The right to manage the affairs of State is not a right that Indians have. They should have it, in order that their paper rights become real and remain real. Till then they will have to fight to make them real. your commendable initiative is one such fight. meher engineerFlag
-
6
Name: Dunu Roy on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Priya Narasimham on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Poonam Bir Kasturi on Nov 28, 2009Comments: This is really not to be allowed -Flag
-
9
Name: Abhishek Nag on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Dhyan on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Why dont you stop the real agencies who are going to do damage to the park like the White Elephant Metro Rail. Also why dont you post more policemen to these parks to protect the citizens against the antisocial elements instead of harassing all those who want to enter the park.Flag
-
11
Name: Renni P. Mathuuny on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Right to Use Public Spaces is a fundamental component of Right to LiveFlag
-
12
Name: Jane Bradshaw on Nov 28, 2009Comments: As a one time resident of Bangalore I am appaled that this park may be closed to poorer people and possibly even to visitors unaware of the restriction. Free access to places of beauty and peace is especially important to those who live humbly in a crowded city.Flag
-
13
Name: Sairam Subramnian on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Sanjay Gathia on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: K Srikrishna on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: K Srikrishna on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Navya PK on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Ramesh on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Devanshi Chanchani on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Molly Charles on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Velpanur on Nov 28, 2009Comments: This action of the government deserves utmost condemation and a PIL needs to be filed.Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2009Comments: I protest against the idea of identity card to parks by the government. The civilians has the every right to use the public parks. I would appreciate if you bring other civic friendly kind of rules than very autocratic and privatising system in the name protecting the public spaces. Give the sense of ownership to the public & partner with them than imposing such no-sense rules.Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: G Dakshina Murthy on Nov 28, 2009Comments: This is a highly deplorable, meaningless and insensitive initiative. The proposal should be opposed in the strongest way.Flag
-
25
Name: S Uma Mahesh on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Sri Umesh Katti, I am particularly intrigued at the current govt., that prides itself in championing the cause of down trodden, poor, natives, (mannena magas) does this. Surely there will be reasons, many valid, but the -ves overwhelm the +ves of this move, IMHO.... And there will be alternatives to explore that could do better than this... I hope better senses prevail.... soon... MaheshFlag
-
26
Name: Neville Lobo on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Arunodaya POIRADA on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Violation of fundamental rights of the publicFlag
-
28
Name: Dwiji Guru on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Parks should be open to all, it is a public space and should not be regulated like a private garden or a gym.Flag
-
29
Name: Subbu Sastry on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Hiroo Advani on Nov 28, 2009Comments: I support this protest wholeheartedly. This discrimination must not be allowed.Flag
-
31
Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Clive Mann on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Anna Smith on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Narayan on Nov 28, 2009Comments: This is a draconian measure and should not be allowed.Flag
-
35
Name: P. Aravinda on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Public parks must be open to the public. Public should be able to move freely in public without individual electronic surveillance.Flag
-
36
Name: Regis C. on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Bharti on Nov 28, 2009Comments: public parks should always be commom property to be shared by all irrespectove of ability to pay.Flag
-
38
Name: Ramana on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Bharath on Nov 28, 2009Comments: We are ruled by Rowdies who have no authority and rowdies who have authority and Police who favour these and judges who have no wisdomFlag
-
40
Name: Ajay Jain on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Please get a better solution to the problem if secuirty is the primary concernFlag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Manish Jain on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Surendran K.K. on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Rajesh Kasturirangan on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Sharanya on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: EQUATIONS Team on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Public places belong to us all- parks , roads, lakes, commons - and particularly important is access for common people - the poor.Flag
-
47
Name: Arundhathi Krishnan on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Kiran Kamal Prasad on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Premeela M. on Nov 28, 2009Comments: Ths s getting ridiculous. What did Ghandhi die forFlag
-
50
Name: Kiran Kamal Prasad on Nov 28, 2009Comments:Flag