Stop private housing on Crystal Palace Park

Signatures 276 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6

1. 251
   Name: Noaiusywterdg on Apr 4, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 252
   Name: Bvaeropljsue on Apr 4, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 253
   Name: Nabquisodp on Apr 5, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 254
   Name: Moplaiwiueu on Apr 5, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 255
   Name: Moilpaiwuye on Apr 5, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 256
   Name: Gayauqqiwu on Apr 6, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 257
   Name: Gayauqqiwuksi on Apr 6, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 258
   Name: Bayauseoekd on Apr 7, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 259
   Name: Buturnahsuwo on Apr 9, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 260
    Name: Gqiaajueusjssd on Apr 12, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 261
    Name: Vatewipsldkjj on Apr 12, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 262
    Name: Bayetweirpldksj on Apr 13, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 263
    Name: Mbayeuwikusjssd on Apr 13, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 264
    Name: Kenneth Grahame on Jun 9, 2010

    Comments: This would be leave other areas of public land in danger of similar enchroachment by councils whose only purpose is to offload costs and make short term cash gains.

    Flag
15. 265
    Name: Danielle Pagnacco Warwick on Jul 27, 2010

    Comments: Stop this proposed vandalism of Crystal Palace Park. These luxury flats and houses will be the first of many. Parks are for recreation, relaxation and enjoyment, not for commercial development by greedy speculators.

    Flag
16. 266
    Name: Simone Campling on Jan 25, 2011

    Comments: Keep the park a park

    Flag
17. 267
    Name: Rebecca Munday on Feb 20, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 268
    Name: Luke Bishop on Feb 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 269
    Name: Anonymous on May 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 270
    Name: Cinzia Greaves on Jun 11, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 271
    Name: Cinzia Greaves on Jun 11, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 272
    Name: Catriona White on Jul 23, 2011

    Comments: This is really important, why don't they go and build on a brownfield site - its not as if there aren't plenty of them. leave the park alone!

    Flag
23. 273
    Name: Gill Gray on Nov 4, 2011

    Comments: No! to private (ie profit making) development of a public facility

    Flag
24. 274
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 275
    Name: Africa Munyama on Mar 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 276
    Name: Gloria Fisher on May 19, 2012

    Comments: This a Landmark to be preserved and enhanced by educational and crowd pleasing events. I spent my salad days living in Upper Norwood, and obtained my motor cycle license through a training course given by the RAC at Crystal Palace.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6