Signatures 5319 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, ... 107 › »

1. 4251
   Name: Diann Nichols on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 4252
   Name: Michael Seay on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 4253
   Name: Krista Hogg on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4254
   Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 4255
   Name: Douglas Potts on May 5, 2012

   Comments: I just renewed my membership 2 weeks ago. Had I know about this, I certainly would not have contributed my money to support such a contrary cause to the purpose of the Arboretum.

   Flag
6. 4256
   Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 4257
   Name: Britt Morris on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 4258
   Name: Ellen Katzen on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 4259
   Name: Margaret G. Bonner on May 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 4260
    Name: Bobby H. Boggs on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 4261
    Name: Wanda Goodwin on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Please, no parking lot at Winfrey Park

    Flag
12. 4262
    Name: Robert Trail on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 4263
    Name: Danny Middleton on May 5, 2012

    Comments: We used to tear Winfrey Point up in the not so enlightened days. Arboretum now wanting to go back to bad ol days when ecology was just a word we misspelled.

    Flag
14. 4264
    Name: Sarah on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 4265
    Name: Irene Loycano on May 5, 2012

    Comments: We don't need more pavement ..

    Flag
16. 4266
    Name: Suzanne Thomas on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 4267
    Name: William Thornton on May 5, 2012

    Comments: The City of Dallas and its Parks Dept have evidently limited their focus on Winfrey Point to the exclusion of other area possibilities for special event parking. Preservation and Protection of Winfrey Point and related Dallas Parks Dept. historical landmark properties has never been more important than now. Also, significant taxpayer moneys have been spent on this limited vision project which is not beneficial to the city as a whole.

    Flag
18. 4268
    Name: Michael Lobmeyer on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 4269
    Name: Karen Meyers on May 5, 2012

    Comments: please stop pouring cement on our parks

    Flag
20. 4270
    Name: Stuart Harrison on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 4271
    Name: Karl Nettles on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 4272
    Name: Grace Darling And John Darling on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Please explore other options for accommodating visitors to the Arboretum without cars. Building more parking lots is destructive and unsustainable.

    Flag
23. 4273
    Name: Sharon Russell on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 4274
    Name: Kvansweden on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 4275
    Name: Steven Carter on May 5, 2012

    Comments: This is a reprehensible action by the Arboretum, its like the Counting Crows song, they want to pave paradise and put in a parking lot, and then charge people to come in and see the flowers.

    Flag
26. 4276
    Name: Monique Black on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 4277
    Name: George Neal on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 4278
    Name: Elaine Starr on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 4279
    Name: Joe Mathia on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 4280
    Name: Jonathan Bull on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 4281
    Name: Clara Blair on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Prairies and grasslands are recognized as among the most at risk habitats worldwide. Blackland prairies are rarest of the rare…less than 0.5% remain. Grassland bird species are in decline due to loss of these habitats; disturbance at this time of year is particularly damaging as nests (& potentially eggs and/or young) of these ground-nesting birds would be destroyed. Prairie, not parking.

    Flag
32. 4282
    Name: Jon Bull on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 4283
    Name: Ashley Bull on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 4284
    Name: Michele Logan on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Stop the insanity!

    Flag
35. 4285
    Name: Jon Pitt on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 4286
    Name: Jeanne C. Sanders on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Records show a year or more of planning has gone into this project. To wait until one week before a major exhibit at the Arboreatum for the plans to go public suggests an attempt to bully homeowners in the area into accepting the proposed plans without any input. Shameful. This should have been open for debate & mediation from the beginning.

    Flag
37. 4287
    Name: Deborah Marshall-Brown on May 5, 2012

    Comments: There are miles and miles of asphalt and parking around White Rock Lake. There is ONE Winfrey Point. Dallas Arboretum, STAY OFF THE GRASS, stay off Winfrey Point.

    Flag
38. 4288
    Name: G. P. Visser on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 4289
    Name: Stuart Ashcraft on May 5, 2012

    Comments: I LOVE RIDING MY BIKE BY WINFERY POINT TO SEE ALL THE WILED FLOWERS ON THE HILL THER IS A BIG PARKING LOTE BUKNER AND GARLAND ROD AT COWBOYS DANCEHALL.

    Flag
40. 4290
    Name: MaryClare Milner on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Please find an alternate site!

    Flag
41. 4291
    Name: Earl Darling on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 4292
    Name: Ana Castillo on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 4293
    Name: Pam Dennehy on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 4294
    Name: Sandra Nottestad on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Not a good way to help our city maintain greenspace. No more parking lots. Let the arboretum purchase distressed properties on garland road that are already paved for business.

    Flag
45. 4295
    Name: G Wilson on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Why don't they use other parking facilities. It the empty large tracs of land where the apartments were torn down off Skillman? Parking cars at on the park grounds ia about as smart as yard darts. Way to go city leaders!

    Flag
46. 4296
    Name: Molly Hollar on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 4297
    Name: Shannon Critchlow on May 5, 2012

    Comments: Found this info online. FYI http://pavethelake.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/04_barker_pir_pacheco_jan_10_20112.pdf

    Flag
48. 4298
    Name: Anonymous on May 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 4299
    Name: Cynthia Fava on May 5, 2012

    Comments: If more parking is needed, build a multi-level parking garage on an already existing concrete parking lot. Leave the grassland (what little there is of it) for the birds and wildlife. Shame on the city of Dallas for not protecting the nature elements that the people come to see. Another option, don't allow cars on the property and make people ride DART or move them from an off-site parking location.

    Flag
50. 4300
    Name: Cynthia Fava on May 5, 2012

    Comments: If more parking is needed, build a multi-level parking garage on an already existing concrete parking lot. Leave the grassland (what little there is of it) for the birds and wildlife. Shame on the city of Dallas for not protecting the nature elements that the people come to see. Another option, don't allow cars on the property and make people ride DART or move them from an off-site parking location.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, ... 107 › »