Signatures 60 total
Page: 1, 2
-
1
Name: Amanda on Nov 13, 2009Comments: we need more bike lanes, not less!Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Nov 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Craig Sinclair on Nov 18, 2009Comments: Enough with the world where idiot motorists view us as a target, not a fellow road user.Flag
-
4
Name: Craig Sinclair on Nov 18, 2009Comments: Enough with the world where idiot motorists view us as a target, not a fellow road user.Flag
-
5
Name: Alexander Hender on Nov 18, 2009Comments: Removing bike lanes is a retrograde step for cycling safety, car safety, traffic efficiency, environmental concerns and cyclist-motorist relations. The Prospect City Council is incredibly short-sight to be considering this.Flag
-
6
Name: Joshua Steele on Nov 22, 2009Comments: I use prospect rd regularly for riding to and from work because it is the safest route. Main north rd is too dangerous (no bike lanes), prospect rd will become dangerous if the bike lanes are removedFlag
-
7
Name: Patrick Sunter on Nov 23, 2009Comments: I am a regular cyclist in Adelaide, residing in Brooklyn Park and commuting often by bike in the inner suburbs.Flag
-
8
Name: Jeff on Feb 7, 2010Comments: Although bicycle lanes do very little for cyclist safety I feel they are better than nothing. On average I have 2 close calls with cars in bike lanes a day compared to 1 close call every 5 days outside of bike lanes. 3 out of the 4 times I have been hit by cars I was in a bike lane. I am not 100% convinced a bike lane makes riding safer, it seems it makes it more dangerous. I may never recover fully from my injuries but I still ride, I must be crazy.Flag
-
9
Name: Kathy Whitta on Feb 8, 2010Comments: As a resident of the Prospect area who rides to work I am extremely concerned that there are plans to remove bike lanes from Prospect Rd. This would make it extremely unsafe and would discourage people from riding; a regressive move when we should all be moving to more environmentally friendly forms of transport.Flag
-
10
Name: Craig Sinclair on Feb 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: David Kilner on Feb 8, 2010Comments: Extend cycling infrastrucure - don't reduce itFlag
-
12
Name: Chris on Feb 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Rolf Heinrich on Feb 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Jacqui Kinder on Feb 9, 2010Comments: I use a bike to get to work and appreciate the use of mikes lanes on foot paths or as a bike lane on the road. please keep them and dont remove them.Flag
-
15
Name: Jeff Lock on Feb 10, 2010Comments: Should be adding more and carrying them right along the the entire road.NOT removing them.Flag
-
16
Name: Sybil Wakefield on Feb 10, 2010Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Bob Watson on Feb 11, 2010Comments: Any move to reduce opportunities for cycling would be deleterious to the environment and community health.Flag
-
18
Name: Ali Lamshed on Feb 11, 2010Comments: A forward thinking and forward planning council would seek to retain existing infrastructure that encourages people to lessen their carbon footprint! Too many of the current Prospect counsillors are arrogantly unaware of the dedicated efforts of community minded resdients who fought hard to get these bycycle lanes installed. Council has such an opportunity over the next few years to introduce sustainable measures in many of its developmental policies and lead the Adelaide metro area. Don't allow short sighted greed and individual aspirations to turn Prospect Road into another King William Road or Unley Road. Let our suburb rettain the unique and forward thinking policies that have been a badge of our local government body for the last thirty years.Flag
-
19
Name: Helen Slater on Feb 11, 2010Comments: My preference would be for completely separate bicycle 'roads' but until then our largest percentage of capital city riders need the best protection we can offer. All those pumping legs instead of puffing exhausts means a healthier Prospect for allFlag
-
20
Name: David Kings on Feb 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Rosie Knott on Feb 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Lia Weston on Feb 15, 2010Comments: There are so few good bike lanes in Adelaide; removing them is the last thing we need! Already motorists have a blind spot when it comes to cyclists -- we need to stay visible and in our own area for everyone's safety.Flag
-
23
Name: Sarah Kurlinkus on Feb 15, 2010Comments: Keep cyclists safe, keep the bike lanes. If you need more space remove the parked cars. I'm sure the drivers need to walk having been driven around alllday.Flag
-
24
Name: Paul Jewell on Feb 15, 2010Comments: To REMOVE a bike lane is an amazing step in the wrong direction. Even committed motorists should realize that every cyclist on the road represents less traffic congestion for all, and bike lanes are an essential part of making cycling feasible and safe.Flag
-
25
Name: Catherine Cox on Feb 16, 2010Comments: How about looking to the future with an ageing population? have a wide bike lane for the shopping precinct so that as legislation changes the wider lane can be shared by cycles, gophers etc. Restrict car use to 2 narrow lanes with a speed limit of at most 40kph for safety.Flag
-
26
Name: Leigh Pedder on Feb 16, 2010Comments: With the growing number of bike riders it would be irresponsible to loose any bike lanes, especially on busy roads.Flag
-
27
Name: John Toshach on Feb 16, 2010Comments: As a regular visitor to Prospect, I would like to see the extension of the bicycle lanes in Prospect and the reduction of traffic speeds on major arterial roads. In my country town of Milang & Strathalbyn , the speed limit is 50 km/hr on all roads through the town. Thank YouFlag
-
28
Name: Evdokia Kalaitzidis on Feb 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Feb 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Tony Bazeley on Feb 16, 2010Comments: I use Prospect road regularly, when vising my sister who lives in Victoria St ProspectFlag
-
31
Name: Susan Forby on Feb 16, 2010Comments: As a cyclist I believe that the action you are proposing creates danger and potential injury or death for cyclists. Please reconsider your proposal and take into account all road users including cyclists. It is in the best interest of your council and the state of South Australia to encourage more people to ride their bicycles and not revert to using their motor vehicles. Thank you for your consideration. Susan ForbyFlag
-
32
Name: Diana Tebneff on Feb 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Darren Alcoe on Feb 17, 2010Comments: A shameful proposal by PCC, at a time when safety for cyclists should be of paramount concern. We should be doing all we can to encourage cycling as the preferred method of commuting, not discouraging it.Flag
-
34
Name: Anonymous on Feb 17, 2010Comments: this is backwards!Flag
-
35
Name: Claire Boland on Feb 17, 2010Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Bernhard Sayer on Feb 17, 2010Comments: keep the cycle lanes on Prospect Road!!Flag
-
37
Name: Andrew Hall on Feb 18, 2010Comments: Why do this? Please explain how removing bike lanes make things better? Are you trying to say that bikes are the problem?Flag
-
38
Name: Denis Alfonso on Feb 22, 2010Comments: bicycles outsold motorcars last year. Does that give you a hint of the future?Flag
-
39
Name: Samantha on Mar 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Halina Mutton on Mar 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Robyn Waite on Apr 2, 2010Comments: In this era of climate emergency, all levels of government must encourage the safe use of bicycles and public transport.Flag
-
42
Name: Luke on Apr 9, 2010Comments: Cycling should be made EASIER not harderFlag
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Apr 9, 2010Comments: We should be making it easier for bike riders, not harder. Less cars on the roads = happier, healthier people and is also good for the environment!Flag
-
44
Name: Leonard Andrew Spencer on Apr 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Lucy West-Sooby on Apr 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Des Lawrence on Apr 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Hannah on Apr 9, 2010Comments: I absolutley disagree with the decision to remove bike lanes in Prospect.Flag
-
48
Name: Elizabeth Milner on Apr 10, 2010Comments: I have lived and cycled in a number of cities around the world and moved to Adelaide because it is supposed to be a great place to cycle. It isn't, it is downright dangerous. Removing the small amount of safety these lanes give to cyclists would not only be a huge backwards step but it would also be putting more cyclists lives at risk by inconsiderate drivers. Climate change is real, the Australian scientists at CSIRO and the Bureau of Meterology believe so strongly this is so both agencies have publicly declared their findings. The most efficient form of non polluting transport is to cycle. Health benefits of cycling are irrefutable. Prospect should be making cycling more accessible and safer for all, not removing the few cycle lane which currently exist.Flag
-
49
Name: Garth Wimbush on Apr 10, 2010Comments: Let's see some real concerted action on reducing motor vehicle use! Safer roads for cycles encourages more cyclists, which reduces our carbon footprint, reduces the need to build extra roads to cope with more traffic, improves general health, and stretches the remaining oil reserves out. Bikes are the most efficient form of transport.Flag
-
50
Name: Andrew Prior on Apr 10, 2010Comments: Prospect Road, despite constant parking in the bike lanes during restricted hours is one of the safest north routes out of the city. Don't spoil it!Flag
Page: 1, 2