Signatures 12 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2009Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Rachid Chehade on Oct 19, 2009Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Rachid Chehade on Oct 19, 2009Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Jed Holman on Dec 15, 2009Comments: There is enough to go around and the human spirit of co-operation and compassion can replace wanton competition. Other options should be considered instead of the status quo. (PS the inner circle does not entertain all potentialities)Flag
-
5
Name: Dean Malone on Dec 21, 2009Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Philip McCormack on Jan 1, 2010Comments: Dear Obama, Giving money to banks and finance houses without asking the taxpayer is fraud.mPhilipFlag
-
7
Name: Tim McCormick on Feb 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Richard Priestman on Apr 12, 2010Comments: In addition to the immense savings to tax payers which occurs when a government borrows from its own public bank at almost zero interest instead of from commercial banks and other private lenders at commercial rates of interest, the government would be freed of the influence of those who hold the debt. This latter is of even greater importance than the savings because it allows the government to give preference foremost to the needs of its people rather than to the wishes of the lenders. This presupposes that the nation has a publicly-owned bank.Flag
-
9
Name: John Goldsworthy on Apr 14, 2010Comments: Continuous growth of capitalism cannot be supported there must be a finite limit to economic expansion. The boom and bust tendency of capitalism is living proof of this concept.Flag
-
10
Name: Alexander Frei on Apr 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Larry Kazdan on Aug 6, 2010Comments: The public interest above private interest!Flag
-
12
Name: David Andrighetti on Sep 3, 2010Comments:Flag
Page: 1