Signatures 19450 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 389 › »
-
151
Name: Paul B. Watkins on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Pamela B. Davis, M.D., Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: Matt Wyatt on Mar 21, 2011Comments: A cut to NIH funding represents a conscious decision to further diminish the research capacity of the United States. I realize that a funding increase in this economic climate is impossible, but a cut could prove disastrous to US science. Instead of cutting research spending, how about you stop cutting taxes for the rich instead? They've plenty of money to go around.Flag
-
156
Name: Janet M. Shaw on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
157
Name: Andrew Martens on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Science research has consistently proved to be one of the best investments we can make.Flag
-
158
Name: Bruce Cronstein on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
159
Name: Reena Rai on Mar 21, 2011Comments: NIH funding is extremely important for advancement of science and thereby benefits to mankind. A very big example of benefits of such funding is the significant decline in deaths from several major diseases such as leukemia (decreased from 65% childhood mortality to about 5%). I hope the govt and people see this and realize the significance of this funding. Thank you.Flag
-
160
Name: Victoria G Hohenstein on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
161
Name: Laurine Bow on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
162
Name: Sean W. Cain, Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
163
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
164
Name: Steven Goodman, MD, PhD on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Hard to imagine a more foolish economy. Biomedical research and innovation, along with its economic and social benefits, is one of the very few areas where the US is an unquestioned world leader; we have exported or squandered our competitive edge in almost every other industry and arena. This will not only severely impact this enterprise for years to come, it will produce a massive export of foreign-born scientists who will reproduce in their home countries what they used to find here. At the same time, it will also cause a massive shift of potential US investigators away from research; the life is tenuous enough as it is. The results are completely predictable, profoundly harmful short and long term, and irreversible.Flag
-
165
Name: Monika Safford on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
166
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Please don't stop funding for students. That funding is vital to our nation's future.Flag
-
167
Name: Jennifer Berger on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
168
Name: Jeff M. Sands, MD on Mar 21, 2011Comments: NIH funding is vital to improving health in the US. Any cut in NIH funding will significantly harm biomedical research within the US. Not only does biomedical research improve health, it creates jobs and uses products made in the US. The US is currently the world leader in this area. Losing our leadership position would have very harmful effects, both on health and the economy.Flag
-
169
Name: Jessica Houtz on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
170
Name: Christopher Ferguson on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
171
Name: Yi-Ping Li on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
172
Name: Amjad Husain on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
173
Name: Dionisia Saner on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
174
Name: Randy Mason on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
175
Name: Elena Tous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
176
Name: Yi-Ping Li on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
177
Name: Jennifer Banaszek on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
178
Name: Billy Ross on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
179
Name: Lisa A. Johnson on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
180
Name: Becca Starr on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
181
Name: Charles Wendland on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
182
Name: Charles Wendland on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
183
Name: Vance Plumb, MD on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Laura Whitton on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
185
Name: Vance Plumb, MD on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
186
Name: Alberta Clyne on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
187
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
188
Name: Meredith Fisher on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
189
Name: Maria Montoya Hohenstein on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Our future depends upon our country being on the cutting edge of medical research. We export few things, but what we do have is our ability to research and develop in the fields of science.Flag
-
190
Name: Evangeline Amargo on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
191
Name: SW Ballinger on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
192
Name: John Gearhart on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
193
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
194
Name: R. Brooks Robey on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Any short-term fiscal gains achieved through such ill-advised cuts will undermine long-term discovery prospects and sabotage gains made through prior investment in science.Flag
-
195
Name: Steven Shea on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: Shideh Kazerounian on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
197
Name: Gregory A. Petsko on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
198
Name: Adviye Ergul on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Biomedical research is our future.Flag
-
199
Name: David Goldberg on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
200
Name: Sherry L. Mettley on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag