Signatures 19450 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 389 › »

1. 101
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Carole Bahara on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Selvarangan Ponnazhagan on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Thierry Bertomeu on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Cheng-Yu Lee on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Robert Signer on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Nianyi Zhang on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Elsa Quintana-fernandez on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Medha Manchekar on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Sarah Tomkovich on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Randy Schekman on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: The US remains the leading force in biomedicine around the world, but that leadership position is just as fragile as our previous superior position in public primary and secondary education. If we now also retrench in science and biomedicine, the rest of the developed world, particularly China, will surely move ahead. Randy Schekman

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Jack Mosher on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Please make it a national priority to adequately fund the NIH. The health of our citizens depends on it.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Shaila Handattu on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: For the health of the American people and the American economy, do not cut funding for the National Institutes of Health.

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Michael Bundesmann on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: George Howard on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: We are working for the nation's health, and paying great dividend (particularly in heart disease and stroke).

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Mark Donowitz, MD on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Cutting an economic engine for the country and hurting our future leadership in science does not sems to be a goal that Congress should be pushing for.

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Ivan Maillard on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Qing Li on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Brad Nelson on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: If you truly want to preserve or create jobs, then don't cut the funding that does just that. Research doesn't pay a lot so many jobs could be lost if funding is cut.

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Joan A. Steitz on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Keeping basic research alive now is essential for discoveries of the future that will directly enhance human health.

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Art Martin on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Erin Sheets on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Marina Pasca Di Magliano on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Bing Ye, Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Sean M. Burgess on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Wendy B Bollag, Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: The tight funding climate from flat NIH funding is already causing the loss of good scientists from research. Please do not make things worse by cutting support to NIH.

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: JoAnne Engebrecht on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Cindy Holstein on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Needhi Bhalla on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Christie Paulson on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Not only would budget cuts negatively affect our current ability to perform the best research and bring novel solutions to those suffering from illness and injury, but they would thwart the entrance of the rising generation into biomedical research by reducing the number of positions available and creating a discouraging "career outlook". Who, then, will be the leading scientists of Tomorrow?

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Lindsey Hitchcock on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Micah Webster on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Victoria Kholodenko on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Alfred L. George, Jr., M.D. on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Richard Shingles on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Kylie Chew on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Frederic Chedin on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: The biomedical research community has contributed enormously to the health, quality of life, and future of mankind. Be smart, don't cut the fuel for these efforts. NIH spending should be bolstered, not cut.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Rebbecca Moen on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Lewis Landsberg on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Philip R. Johnson, M.D. on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Daniel Starr on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Mary Weston on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Monica Nadler, Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Cora Lewis on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: UAB is the largest employer in the state of Alabama and a large number of jobs are dependent on this funding, to say nothing of the future competitiveness of our country. We are still tops in the world in biomedical research but won't remain so if funding is slashed. Let's not let America's institutions go the way of GM.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Kathryn Howell on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Mary Ann Gardone on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Alex Botvin on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 389 › »