Signatures 19450 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 389 › »
-
51
Name: Ross Frommer on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: James J. Galligan, Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Joanne Murphy-Ullrich on Mar 21, 2011Comments: NIH funding also creates good paying jobs!Flag
-
54
Name: Lynn Marquis on Mar 21, 2011Comments: The NIH is our country’s preeminent medical research enterprise and represents our greatest hope for finding cures and treatments for chronic and debilitating diseases that afflict millions of Americans. Any significant cut to the NIH budget will slow research progress and squander invaluable scientific opportunities, to the detriment of our nation’s health.Flag
-
55
Name: Steven M. Pogwizd, MD on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Martin Young on Mar 21, 2011Comments: NIH-funded medical research is essential for improving US health and economy.Flag
-
57
Name: Jennifer Sasser on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Kevin Wilson on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
59
Name: L. Bruce Gladden on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Richard J. Paul on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Martin Chalfie on Mar 21, 2011Comments: The work for which I received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2008 was completely funded by an NIH grant. The continued funding is needed to unlock the biological mysteries underlying human disease and well being. Support for basic research is critical for this endeavor.Flag
-
62
Name: Matt Barry on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: H. Akil on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Richard Hynes on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
65
Name: Michael W. Brands on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Cyclic NIH budgets with repeating low-periods that cause loss of labs and jobs at universities is a death blow to recruiting, training, and development of young U.S. biomedical scientists. The recovery in training lags so severely behind any recoveries in funding that the decline becomes continuous.Flag
-
66
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Cutting these funds would jepardize cutting edge research which leads to cures of fatal diseases.Flag
-
67
Name: Zdenek Hel, Ph.D. on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Amit Gaggar on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: David B. Allison on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Jack M Rogers on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Cynthia Turk Pogwizd on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Professor Beverly Wendland on Mar 21, 2011Comments: In addition to the clearly important work of the NIH and its funded investigators described above, I also want to emphasize the critical role all NIH investigators play in training the next generations of scientists and doctors, in educating the public about biology and science pertaining to their health and treatments of their diseases, and in being a real engine for innovation of all types.Flag
-
73
Name: Robert C Bourge MD on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
74
Name: Charles White on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: James George on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: Meda Higa on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
77
Name: Thomas Van Groen on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Steven Teitelbaum on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
79
Name: Gary Borisy on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Eric Belin De Chantemele on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: John A Cooper on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
82
Name: Geeta Datta on Mar 21, 2011Comments: I do not support a reduction in NIH funding. This is extremely important for biomedical research.Flag
-
83
Name: Gang Liu on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Medical research is vital to american people's health and to future federal spending reduction. We oppose any cuts in NIH budgetFlag
-
84
Name: Joan E Broderick on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
85
Name: Katherine L. Wilson on Mar 21, 2011Comments: Funding for basic biomedical research at universities and medical schools is CRUCIAL for our nation's health, and our bio-pharmaceutical industries.Flag
-
86
Name: Kathleen J. Green on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
87
Name: Marilyn S. Teitelbaum on Mar 21, 2011Comments: It is imperative that the research supported by the NIH continue at not less than the current levels adjusted for inflation.Flag
-
88
Name: Alan Gertler on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Bhushan Desai on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Avice Meehan on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: Zsuzsa Bebok on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: Roya Khosravi-Far on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Dr. Amanda Zacharias on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Deneen Wellik on Mar 21, 2011Comments: This is critical to our nation's futureFlag
-
96
Name: Jodi Johnson on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
97
Name: Richard McCann on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
98
Name: Viktor Todorovic on Mar 21, 2011Comments: I've already contacted my senators and representative, which I advise everyone else to do. Petitions are nice, but direct contact with your elected representatives is the best way of conveying this message.Flag
-
99
Name: William A. Curry, MD on Mar 21, 2011Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Ryan Hobbs on Mar 21, 2011Comments: I am a recent PhD graduate and would like to pursue an academic research career. As the NIH funds the majority of academic research in this country, cutting their budget will have an immediate and definite impact on finding a job, for not just myself, but for all young investigators for years to come. Please do not cut our funding!Flag