Preserve Northview

Signatures 212 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 51
   Name: Judith Barrow on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Peter Knight on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments: We are regular visitors to Northview, and really enjoy it's unique charm. I am horrified by the plns to ruin it.

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Jackie Knight on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments: I have already written to the planning people to try and stop this lovely estate with its many original features being ruined by an ugly addition. I have friends who live there and they are extremely distressed that this threat is still going on - and so am I!

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: John P Monson on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Peter A. Monson on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Sarah Lawrie on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments: Northview is unique and must be preserved. I urge you to support this objection.

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Angela Coles on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments: This would lead to a degradation of a very fine example of Art Deco architecture

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Nigel Hewson on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments: A heinous money-making scheme to line the pockets of the landlord and managing agent with no consideration for the Art Deco inspired village green feel nor the impact this would have on the residents. Please join us in opposing this application and sign this petition

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Rory Argyle on Dec 6, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Nick Hill on Dec 6, 2012

    Comments: It would indeed become a modern carbuncle sat upon a period classic.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Hugh Ross on Dec 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: David Harkins on Dec 6, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Jeremy Laurance on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Janet Green on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Jessica on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Helen Cagnoni on Dec 8, 2012

    Comments: As 'tempory guardians' Islington Councillors have no right to impose these frightful carbuncles on roofs and grounds of existing estates to please the profiteering minority.

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Nigel Winn on Dec 8, 2012

    Comments: This lovely 1930's block must be preserved and not ruined by greedy developers

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Nigel on Dec 8, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Elisabetta on Dec 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Sarah Rozenthuler on Dec 9, 2012

    Comments: Northview is an architectural gem and a very good place to live. Its preservation in its original form brings a great quality of life to its residents, neighbours and Holloway Road.

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Michael Steven on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments: Planning permission must not be granted to build on the roof of Northview. The flats are a haven to peace and tranquillity which would be forever lost. The light that falls into the gardens would be cast in shadow and the unique shape and feel of the building gone. Profits should not come before a piece of unique Islington Architecture and its survival as a landmark to Art Deco glory. Northview needs listing and restoring back to its former grace not left to decay and be buried under a proposal that would forever mean its loss to its shape and unique architectural detail.

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: David KIllick on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments: This is a unique building and should be preserved in its original design.

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Luciano Antoniazzi on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: We completely understand the concerns of the tenants of Northview. This planning application must not go ahead.

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Magda Garnuszek on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: This beautiful example of Art Deco architecture must not be ruined by the unsightly addition to the top floor.

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Emma Page on Dec 14, 2012

    Comments: Northview should be conserved as it is for the future by being included in the conservation area, not repeatedly threatened by inappropriate planning applications.

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Ed De Vroome on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Alison Borazan on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments: I oppose the proposed scheme

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Adrian Kennedy on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments: Do not allow the character, culture and charm of this area to be destroyed. The proposed development is antipathetic to the spirit and style of the existing structures. I understand that planning guidance is permissive, however, I would urge you to reject this proposal which would result in a charmless hydrid building. The proposal has insufficient practical value and lacks social or cultural purpose. It is clearly only driven by an artless and destructive profit-motive.

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Amanda Carrara on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments: I write as Chair of Oakfield Court Residents' Association (Haslemere Road, N8). Like Northview we are a 1930s 3 storey redbrick estate under threat from developers over the last few years. Like Oakfield Court, Northview is of architectural merit and the integrity of their built estate and community should be conserved not destroyed by inappropriate and insensitive development. I urge Islington Council to reject this planning application, save Northview once and for all and protect our common architectural and social heritage.

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Mayerlene Engineer on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Equador Zaha on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Stephen Hoyle on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments: The planning application is for intrusive over-development and should be rejected.

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Darian Mitchell on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments: Developers must stop spoiling good examples of historic architecture in order to make money, and politicians should stop supporting them in order to reduce their waiting lists and cram more people into what is an already crowded environment.

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Zareer Masani on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Mick Gilfoyle on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments: Let democracy prevail, put a stop to money grabbing developers ruining wonderful living spaces. Target all those unused properties owned by rich people who buy property just to make money without anyone ever living in them of charge exorbitant rents. It is time our politicians had the balls and leadership to do what the people who elect them want. Take note good people of Islington what your councillors are doing in your name.

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Cllr Greg Foxsmith on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Claudio Solano on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Anne Chippindale on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Sarwar Osman on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments: We need as many people to sign the petition and attend the Councl meeting on 22nd Jan and future meetings

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Chris Gravell on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Gerald Azzopardi on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Marisa Azzopardi on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Jo Siedlecka on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments: There are so few art deco buildings like this, carefully designed around green spaces, we should treasure them not destroy them.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Antonia Baker on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: NIgel Baker on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »