Preserve Northview

Signatures 132 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Christy Lawrance on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments: This latest design is particularly vile. The proposed floor, made out of graceless ridged zinc, is harsh and is more appropriate to an industrial estate

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Richard Pugh on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments: I fully support the aims of the Northview residents in opposing what would be an appalling act of architectural vandalism

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Margaret Pugh on Nov 17, 2012

   Comments: I am very concerned about the development plans proposed by the freeholder. I fully support the aims of the Northview petitioners.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Mary Wash on Nov 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Gillian Hawkes on Nov 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: John Warwick on Nov 18, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Janet Kinnin on Nov 21, 2012

   Comments: Please do not let them ruin our lovely flats. It would be a complete devastation.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Dave Kinnin on Nov 21, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: David Wilson on Nov 22, 2012

   Comments: The developer is all wrong about NorthView. Another storey will ruin it and deface a much loved treasure in North London

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Kathleen Greaves on Nov 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: David Connolly on Nov 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: C Simmonds on Nov 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Jonny Anderson on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: This has already been rejected once, here's hoping it's rejected again.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Amanda Merrick on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: I oppose this planning application.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Annelise Langmead on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: I believe that this application should be denied.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Heather Gessey on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Neil on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Meg Howarth on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: I fully support Northview's residents against their greedy freeholder's repeated attempts to instal another storey on this charming 1930's block - in order to rake in more unearned rentier income.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Oliver Philpott on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Susan Lowenthal on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: I agree that the proposals are out of proportion, use materials and are insensitive to the character of the estate

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Robert McCorquodale on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Jack Hale on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Melissa Martin on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: please understand that this small estate is a thriving community and a unique example of 1930s architecture.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Dr. WIlliam Pugh on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Kate Gessey on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: Barmy idea. This proposal would completely ruin an important example of London's 1930's architecture.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Richard Stacey on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Sarah Richards on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments: Protection of a long-standing and cherished built environment for this community is vital at this time of increasing uncertainty

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Alan Mole on Nov 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Joshua Abbott on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Paul Thurlow on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: John Douglas on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments: Stop these repeated attempts of vandalism.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Vernal Scott on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments: I totally oppose the proposal to build on top of the long existing building known as Northview. Build elsewhere.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Eloise Boon on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments: The plans for building another level on these flats from the 1930's is ridiculous! This is all about money and not about current building or the lives of those living there already. I lived at Northview for three years and it is an oasis, something special, a beautiful building and piece of the past that needs to be treasured and kept as it is.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Philip Pothen on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: This proposal would spoil this fine building and the quality of life of the people who live there...

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Russell Ager on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Buildings such as Northview need to be preserved fro future generations to enjoy.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Helen Philpott on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Mr V O'Callaghan on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: A R Philpott on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Jim Pugh on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments: This area preserves an attractive part of our architectural heritage that must be preserved, not only for the present residents, but also for future generations. No additions or changes should be permitted.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Linda Pugh on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments: There is no way that these builds should have their appearance tainted by the addition of a modern structure totally out of keeping with the architect's original design.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: John Keleher on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments: It is important to retain good examples of our architectural heritage

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Tracy Ismail on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Sarah Marks on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Chynna on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments: I am moving here this month and completely agree with the residents! Leave such a beautifully and thoughtfully laid out structure alone.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Emma Wilson on Nov 26, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Granville Spencer on Nov 28, 2012

    Comments: Nothview is a lovely place;hightening it will spoil it,as will bringing in more people. Too tall and overcrouded.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Mark Smulian on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments: reject this proposed architectural vandalism of a unique 1930s deco enclave.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Francesca Evans on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: The Localism bill says communities have more say - if the community wants to keep it then it should be able to.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Abigail McKern on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: LEAVE NORTHVIEW ALONE! People want it preserved not ruined.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3