Routledge Pro Porn Studies Bias

We understand that Routledge is scheduled to publish a new journal, Porn Studies. While we agree that pornography and porn culture demand and deserve more critical attention, as a group of academics, activists, anti-violence experts, health professionals, and educators, we are deeply concerned about the journal’s intention and focus and about its editorial board, which is uniformly pro-porn.


Routledge is in a position of authority, and framing the editorial "experts" on porn as pro-porn under the auspices of neutrality (which is what the journal title does) further fosters the normalization of porn and misrepresents the academic, political and ideological debates about the issue. The composition of the editorial board (at least thus far) risks marginalizing any critical or anti porn position.

Given this, we have three questions: 1) In what ways and to what extent, if any, will this journal feature essays which represent an array of perspectives on the complex and vexed issues concerning pornography and porn culture?; 2) How likely is it that diverse perspectives will be represented, given that the editorial board has a pro-porn academic record?’ and 3) What might Routledge do to address this bias?

In the interest of academic integrity and thorough critical inquiry, it is imperative that a journal titled Porn Studies creates space for critical analyses of porn from diverse and divergent perspectives. Our hope is that you will change the composition of the editorial board, confirm the journal’s commitment to a heterogeneous interrogation of the issues embedded in porn and porn culture, and ensure that diverse perspectives are represented – on the board and also in the essays published in the journal. Failing that, we ask that you change the name to reflect and make evident the bias of its editors (Pro-Porn Studies) and create another journal which will represent the position of anti-porn scholars and activists and the voices of mental health professionals, porn industry survivors, and feminist scholars whose analyses examine the replication and reification of misogyny, child abuse, and sexual exploitation in mainstream pornography (for instance, Critical Porn Studies).

PLEASE INCLUDE TITLE AND AFFILIATION IN SIGNATURE COMMENTS

Sponsor

Stop Porn Culture and concerned academics

Links

http://stoppornculture.org/

Discussion

  • Casey Matter Porn is a very critical topic of study and discussion, but scientific study is not pure if presented with bias. If Porn is truly to be studied, all perspectives and studies should be included

  • Lane Miller In managing a graduate school bookstore, I have sold many Routledge publications. This journal and its lacking commitment to honest scholastic inquiry throws an entire publishing tradition into question.

  • Nicole Prause The assumption is that the journal would not publish good science. I have yet to see any evidence presented that this is the case. I would advise identifying the best, most critical scientists to submit strong work here. See whether they are able to publish, then this might be worth a petition. Shutting down discussion without evidence is premature.

join the discussion

Recent signatures

  • username

    Charlotte Mountain

    5 days ago Comments: -
  • username

    Casey Matter

    3 months ago Comments: Porn is a very critical topic of study and discussion, but scientific study is not pure if presented with bias. If Porn is truly to be studied, all perspectives and studies should be included
  • username

    Lane Miller

    4 months ago Comments: In managing a graduate school bookstore, I have sold many Routledge publications. This journal and its lacking commitment to honest scholastic inquiry throws an entire publishing tradition into question.
See more

Petition highlights

There are no highlights yet.