Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 1745 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 35 »

  1. 101
    Name: Maria O'Driscoll on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: Beverly Holzheimer on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: Please release the Director's Cut! What happened on this film is an outrage that needs to be corrected.
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Danny Strong on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: The directors version is amazing. It definitely needs to be seen.
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Beth Henley on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: SINCERELY, BETH HENLEY
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Alissa Carlton on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Catherine Haight on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Richard Curzon on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: The original creator's intentions ought to be honored. The DVD format allows both versions to be released, and as both would profit all concerned it can only be to the greater good.
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Veronica Diaz on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: Absolutely!! He is a brilliant director, a brilliant story and I can't wait to see it!!!!
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: I want to see this film as it was originally intended to be seen by the DIRECTOR AND WRITER. I have little to no interest in seeing what some other crew member thinks I should see. I want to see the vision of the actual creative force behind the movie. Let's face it, historically speaking, the majority of films that are re-released as the preferred edit of the director are received far better than the original versions. Hell, just to cite a few examples, Blade Runner, Dances With Wolves, Miami Vice, Almost Famous, etc. And, the market can easily support multiple versions of the same film. They can be packaged together (ala Dawn of the Dead with it's 4 disc ultimate edition that contains 3 different versions of the same film), or even separately (ala Exorcist the Beginning/Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist).
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Stacey Rose Fernandez on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: NANCY Serena on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Ellen Nordby on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Kristi Reed on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Gavin Carlton on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: I want to see the director's cut!!!
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Scott Ford on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Sergio Bruna on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Steve MacMillin on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: I'd love to see the Director's cut of The Plague. Always like to see the director/writer's original intent made available.
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Amo Gulinello on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Sherry Herman on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Pam on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments: As a film buff, I enjoy seeing a director's cut of their films. I find them much more interesting. I also will buy that version if I I am choosing a dvd.
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: Patrick Kirst on Jun 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Ellen Bry on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Stop whoring stuff for the sake of the green and quite acting like you know what's best for the film. Give the people and Masonberg what is due and give them the film that is meant to be seen.
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Sean Axmaker on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: Rob Farley on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Save Clive Barker's good name. I saw that crap version on Sci-Fi channel and felt bad for his reputation. Save Clive!
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Save Clive Barker's good name. I saw that crap version on Sci-Fi channel and felt bad for his reputation. Save Clive!
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Save Clive Barker's good name. I saw that crap version on Sci-Fi channel and felt bad for his reputation. Save Clive!
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Kathleen Murphy on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Please release this film. It is criminal to suppress it.
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Alex Reed on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: Richard T. Jameson on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: Knox Hughes on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Release the damn thing - give the artist his integrity...
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Jordana Capra on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: PLEASE release Hal Masonberg's cut -- it's the only one that makes any sense and has great artistic merit!
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Darain Pritchard on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: Why would they not want to make more money on a better cut of an already decent movie. Us horror fans love to buy special editions, fill your pockets with our money, give us the directors cut.
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Greg Naugher on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: This film is garbage, but had so much potenetial. I would love to see the original intent.
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Daemeon Black on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: I personally feel this was wrong of the studio to do. This mere act of excluding those involved in the making of the movie and turning it over to corporate individuals to re-cut the movie and completely ruin the original intent of their efforts is criminal. Please do not let this kind of travesty happen again to ruin the hard work of the director and actors involved in the creation of their labor of love, the movies.
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Chris Peterson on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Hiroo Nakano on Jun 28, 2007
    Comments: it's not supposed to be happened.
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Barry Smolin on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments: It is always to everyone's benefit, including that of the studio, to allow the director's original vision to be seen. I implore Screen Gems to be true to its name and let Hal Masonberg's gem hit the screen as it was conceived and intended by the artist himself.
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments: This is a prime example of Hollywood producers having absolutely no right to fuck with creative just because they can. Just do your job and let those who do what they do well alone. This movie started out so impressive - it was obvious that two separate mindsets worked on it, and a damn shame that it was ruined, because it was very impressive until the guns were added to the storyline. That imediately took away the scare factor. Come on, Screen Gems, I'd like to see the real film. Pretty please
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Richard Hole on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments: Producers stop messing with the visions of the director. They obviously have no love for the film or genre. It's like when fat women wear leggins/lycra, they can't have looked in the mirror and say 'damn i look good'. no one wants to see it!! Leave it alone unless you're collaborating with the director.
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: Shawn Karmil on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments: Way to fight for your vision Hal!
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Marty Langford on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Colin Clarke on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: Colin Clarke on Jun 29, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 35 »

Sponsored links