Signatures 81 total
Page: 1, 2
-
1
Name: Jayleen Brentlinger on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Mark Warner on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: John Nash on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Robert Grant on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Linda Townsend on Jun 13, 2008Comments: To: U. S. Congress PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES We the People of the United States, do hereby demand that our duly elected representatives in both houses of Congress, initiate impeachment proceedings against the following Supreme Court Justices: John Paul Stevens Anthony M. Kennedy David H. Souter Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen G. Breyer We, the undersigned, consider the Supreme Court ruling in Boumediene et al. v. Bush, 06-1195, rendered June 12, 2008, not only unacceptable, but to be in criminal violation of the Justice's oaths to uphold, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Be advised that We the People regard elected officials to be our public servants. Failure to take action against the Justices specified shall be considered support for the decision rendered in the aforementioned case, and will result in our resolve to ensure your defeat in the next election. Being from myriad political and ideological spectra, we are united in our belief that foreign nationals or enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay DO NOT have a right to pursue habeas challenges to their detention. Sincerely, Linda TownsendFlag
-
6
Name: Kevin Dill on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: P. A. Graeff on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Alan Bertram on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Greg L. Winchell on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Linda Stevenson on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Bruce Jones on Jun 13, 2008Comments: Dear Sirs, The aforementioned Justice's have performed an act worhty of redress and recall under any provisions which may be available. As a tax-payer and a citizen, I demand action to see them removed from the bench.Flag
-
12
Name: Paula Jones on Jun 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Thomas P. Roberts on Jun 13, 2008Comments: You don't need a law degree to see how the judges have commited treason. They need to be removed or sent to Iraq with our soldiers for sensitivity training.Flag
-
14
Name: Ellen Kukuchka on Jun 13, 2008Comments: Words cannot express my utter outrage at this traitorous ruling. This is completely UNACCEPTABLE and We The People will simply not tolerate judicial tyranny at ANY level, let alone the US Supreme Court. This is NOT a *defeat* for President Bush as many liberals would like to believe. This is a defeat for the United States and the justices who voted in favor of treason should be IMPEACHED immediately! We The People have simply had ENOUGH!Flag
-
15
Name: Ellen Kukuchka on Jun 13, 2008Comments: Words cannot express my utter outrage at the traitorous ruling made by the US Supreme Court! This is NOT a defeat for President Bush. This is a defeat for the United States and the US Supreme Court has overstepped their bounds with their treasonous ruling. We The People will have the final word. We will NOT tolerate this UNACCEPTABLE ruling. We DEMAND that the above-referenced justices be IMPEACHED IMMEDIATELY! We The People have had enough of judicial tyranny. NO MORE!Flag
-
16
Name: Scott Smith on Jun 13, 2008Comments: The 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court granting terrorists the right to a trial in U.S. civilian courts is perfect grounds for the current President to paraphrase Old Hickory's similar defiance of John Marshall 176 years ago with respect to removal of the Cherokee from Georgia: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it." I wouldn't be so polite. I'd go on national television and tell Supreme Court "justice" Anthony Kennedy where he can stick it, and if he doesn't like it, he can meet me in the front yard of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. and we'll settle it like men, if he can find a man willing to stand in for him. The MSM and the glitterati would have conniption fits, Leftists around the world would have "the vapors", and REAL Americans would cheer from sea to shining sea... Bush's approval rating would go through the roof, just for finally saying "NO! Enough is Enough!".Flag
-
17
Name: Reinald Vallejo Jr on Jun 13, 2008Comments: What these judges did was nothing less than treason. They are no longer interpreting law, but making and breaking laws. There is nothing left to do to these traitors but stand up to them. The President should stand up to this ruling and disobey it as well as every American. This ruling has taken away any benefit of American citizenship. No country in the history of the world has given legal status to granted the same legal status for its attackers as its citizens. If loyal law-abiding American citizens have the same legal status as those who are trying to kill us and end our nation, if we as Americans are equals under our law, then what advantage does being an American have over any other citizen of any other country Do we have any right at all Do we have a nation at all And the logical end of that question is no. No we do not have any rights at all. We do not have a Constitution, we do not have a nation of laws. We have nothing but the anarchy of an oligarchy. Our legal system comes from the same legal tradition as England, the country we revolted from and fought a bloody war to secede from. And just like England had a King that was a tyrant over the people of England, so we have a king-like presence that holds a tyrannical fist over our nation,and that presence is the judges who have traded their U.S. positions given to them to uphold our laws for the position of law makers, law breakers, and treasonists. They are the new King of England in our Brave New America. The only question left is how will modern America we deal with these Kings and Queens Will it be like our forefathers or will it be a total surrender of our power as a free peopleFlag
-
18
Name: Karl Schaupp on Jun 14, 2008Comments: Let's make them STOP Subverting the Constitution!Flag
-
19
Name: Catherine Alling on Jun 14, 2008Comments: The original error [was in] establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and which, from the citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its own will." --Thomas Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes, 1807. FE 9:68Flag
-
20
Name: Robert Sawyer on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: John Parry on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Jack Smith on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Richard Manning on Jun 14, 2008Comments: I served in the paratroops in WWII, severly wounded. If the Court had rendered such a TRATIOUS decision in the course of that War the Judges who cause it would have been, at best, impeached, and, at worse, hung from a tree.Flag
-
24
Name: Frank Saxon on Jun 14, 2008Comments: Fry the bastards, let them know WE THE PEOPLE are runnig this country; not a bunch of spineless polititions, and pinko judges, you gutless pricks.Flag
-
25
Name: Patricia Diller on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Christopher Casey on Jun 14, 2008Comments: Bang the Damn gavel already, toss them to the sharks!Flag
-
27
Name: Tim Porter on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Michael Crews on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Gilbert Hathaway on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: David Watson on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Ronnie Smith on Jun 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Richard Hanna on Jun 15, 2008Comments: These people should not only be impeached, they should be tried as traitors and shot.Flag
-
33
Name: Melanie Manning on Jun 15, 2008Comments: Undermines, again, the Constitution Of The United States and what its Founding Fathers had in mind for this great nation.Flag
-
34
Name: Steve Hathaway on Jun 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Oscar Hinojosa on Jun 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Anonymous on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Linda S Biamonte on Jun 16, 2008Comments: How on earth could justices completely bypass and not even consider in your decision the MCA of 2006 set forth by CongressFlag
-
38
Name: Steve Smith on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Chris Plourde on Jun 16, 2008Comments: Legal protection under OUR laws extends to ITS citizens and NOT those who would do us harm - duh.Flag
-
40
Name: Timm Smith on Jun 16, 2008Comments: It is time for a real discussion regarding the power of the Supreme Court!Flag
-
41
Name: Kenneth Walls on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Karl Krahmer on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Deb Sexton on Jun 16, 2008Comments: Justices, thy name is treason. Nothing gives you the right to subvert our Constitution and undermine the security of our nation. You have made some terrible, terrible decisions, but this is the worst. Congress, start proceedings immediately to remove the Justices listed above from SCOTUS, and every other bench in the nation. They should be thankful that the punishment isn't more severe.Flag
-
44
Name: Harold Olsen on Jun 16, 2008Comments: These 5 judges are not interpreting the law they are writing law...remove them from the court for the sake of the country.Flag
-
45
Name: David Gary on Jun 16, 2008Comments: The SCOTUS is to interpret existing law, not make law. The sovereignty of the United States will be preserved, in spite of the Scotus 5.Flag
-
46
Name: Laurel Cannon on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Christine Hines on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Daniel R. Bogdan on Jun 16, 2008Comments: This ruling is yet another stab in the back to the citizens of the United States of America. I hear the awful sound of the U.S. Constitution being torn asunder...Flag
-
49
Name: Kerry F Leight on Jun 16, 2008Comments: I find it inconceivable that our highest court would bestow Constitutional Rights to a group of people who publicly hold that same document in contempt! It's OUR Constitution, not the Constitution of the world! Foreigners have no right to it's protections, even if they DO subscribe to it's priciples.Flag
-
50
Name: Bruce R. Hess on Jun 16, 2008Comments:Flag
Page: 1, 2