Signatures 89 total
Page: 1, 2
-
1
Name: Mark Wilson on Feb 18, 2013Comments: MoTD needs a revamp it's stuck in the early 90's.Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Awful programme, time for a big shake up.Flag
-
3
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Matthew Frost on Feb 18, 2013Comments: i could make this good againFlag
-
5
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Hasn't been watchable for years. It will be dead soon. Hansen, Lawro and sadly Lineker have become dinosaursFlag
-
6
Name: Ruhel on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Zach Gough on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
9
Name:
Gary J Baker on Feb 18, 2013
Comments:Flag -
10
Name: Bob Jones on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Hate the pundits none of them have got a clue!Flag
-
12
Name: Richard Fabian on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Lawrenson, Hansen, Shearer are dreadful. Time they were moved on.Flag
-
13
Name: Steven on Feb 18, 2013Comments: I have to agree with this petition,as a child growing up and throught my teen years match of the day was like a saturday night institution for me and many of my friends who were football fans. Even if I had seen the game live it was nice to watch the highlights and get a nice bit of commentary and analysis after and enjoy watching other games. Can honestly say I've watched very little motd's in teh last 10 years due to the second rate pundirty during games,bad highlighting and a panel of ex footballers who bring nothing more than cheap jokes and snipes. It's a shame as many people used to enjoy this program and it's been diluted.Flag
-
14
Name: Mort Harries on Feb 18, 2013Comments: it needs a revampFlag
-
15
Name: Richard O'Sullivan on Feb 18, 2013Comments: More game footage, show the times of incidents, and stop cutting matches that give an unfair and innacurate representation of what actually went on over the 90 minutes. Then remind the lads in the studio that theyre sitting on a pundits couch, not the fence.Flag
-
16
Name: Eoin McLernon on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: James Moore on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Get some actual analysis going, not the boys' club.Flag
-
19
Name: Andy Hume on Feb 18, 2013Comments: It's a horrible TV programme, and Shearer can fuck off!Flag
-
20
Name: Jason Mc Daid on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
22
Name:
Jamie Russell on Feb 18, 2013
Comments:Flag -
23
Name: Zztop on Feb 18, 2013Comments: this show is an absolute disasterFlag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: get rid of this waste of moneyFlag
-
25
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: Poor pundits, poor commentators and just an all round cringe - worthy show.Flag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: The pundits on Match of the Day are generally terrible. They don't do any research and don't provide any insight into the games they are watching, which is going against what a pundit is meant to do. This needs to change.Flag
-
28
Name: Conor Savage on Feb 18, 2013Comments: I will still continue to watch it as there is no alternative when I'm not going out, but it needs improving massively.Flag
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Andrew Davies on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments: match of the day what a fantastic product made to look dreary, do us all a favour, extended highlights on the red button no so called pundits pleaseFlag
-
32
Name: Anonymous Facebook user on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Dale on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
37
Name:
Mik Griff on Feb 18, 2013
Comments:Flag -
38
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Tom Bobrovsky on Feb 18, 2013Comments: I DON'T LIKE DIS SHOW ANYMORFlag
-
41
Name:
Evan Kearney on Feb 18, 2013
Comments:Flag -
42
Name: Jack Meof on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Sam Orchard on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Ben on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: John Parker on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Anonymous Facebook user on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: CertifiedBullShitter4 on Feb 18, 2013Comments: MOTD IS FUCKING BOLLOCKS!Flag
-
48
Name: John O'Neill on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Valentino on Feb 18, 2013Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Jerry Crul on Feb 18, 2013Comments: I find the whole thing feeling like it's pitched towards the least enthusiastic supporters out there; much like the producers are concerned at appealing to the wife who is sat beside the actual football fan who craves hearing more insightful comments about the games. I believe they are scared of going for the more serious approach in light of people saying this is too in-depth. The highlights themselves would be best served if they were slightly longer. They are badly edited, as is the audio over the top of it. Very little denotes the way the game went; using the goals as basis for everything is flawed. Often a team that has bossed proceedings can look like they had their backs to their wall if simply outscored. Nepotism shines in Shearer's inclusion; truly an awful pundit. How about just a shake-up. Why on Earth would that be a bad thing?Flag
Page: 1, 2