Pétition contre la hausse rétroactive de de la taxe spécifique sur l'alcool / Petition against the retroactive tax increase on alcohol

Signatures 500 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 10 › »

1. 51
   Name: Lisa on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Thomas Jelonek on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Jf Turbide on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Matthieu Arteau on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments: It seems that every time the Quebec government needs to make a quick cash grab they focus on the restaurant and bar industry. Unfortunately it is one of the most volatile industries in quebec, close to 50% of restaurants close within two years of opening. We are also one of the biggest employers in Quebec and the government has neglected to consider the repercussions of their decisions. Restaurants will close and jobs will be lost, whether it be full time employees who have chosen hospitality as a career or part-time employees who are able to support their educations, their art and their passions with the flexible schedules that restaurants allow. In 2001 the government began taxing tips in Quebec and remains the only province to do so although tipping remains optional to diners. In 2010, the liberal government implemented the infamous MEV system, (the black box that records all sales). Again, this is restricted exclusively to the restaurant industry, essentially labeling us all as tax cheats and to add insult to injury we were forced to purchase the box from the government at 2000$ a piece. (one for every cash register in the restaurant). There is talk of adding water meters to restaurants, yes, again just restaurants and no other industry, and charging us for our consumption of fresh water. The question is why does the government continue to pick on one particular industry? The answer is most probably because we are disorganized, apathetic and our lobby groups and organisations seem to be impotent and uninterested. Tomorrow, is an opportunity for us as an industry to stand up for ourselves and put forth a united front. Maybe we won't be able to affect change on the current legislation but hopefully we will at least make the Quebec government think twice before attacking us again,

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Martin Charlebois on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Arlette Martinez on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments: ca marce pas mme Marrois

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Bruno Bernier on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Jon Deitcher on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Julio Guajardo on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Damien on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Julia Simon on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Colin Perry on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Mary Lenteris on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Silvana Pesut on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Michelle on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Brian Lewis on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Natasha Sniatowsky on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I am against retroactive taxation.

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Andre Baillargeon on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Sabrina Galvano on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Jonathan Smith on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Samuel Gaudet on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Jean-Marie Robin on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Leigh Morton on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Maxim Laliberté on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: abus!

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Bernard Fortin on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Valérie Andrée Authier on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Pascal Manuel on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Ilya Daftari on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Retroactive taxes make no sense... you are basically punishing anyone who have tried to build a nice wine collection or who has decided to have a fully stocked back room...

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Alexandra Boake on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Sarah Odell on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Joanna Fox on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Sabrina Leblond-Murphy on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Ian Sévigny on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Lesley Chesterman on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Hakim Rahal on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Patrick Beaulieu on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Ruth Morrison on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Teguh Dwiputra on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Ellie Moss on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Kate Zinszer on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: It seems ridiculous that a tax can be retrospectively applied. If passed, this would set an ugly precedent.

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Moncef Zaghry on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: its enough!

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Michael Otaka on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Karine Dépelteau on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 10 › »