Help Parsons Avenue

Signatures 386 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 › »

1. 301
   Name: Tawnya Veg on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 302
   Name: Colleen Dempsey on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments: Hal and Als is one of the many reasons I love Columbus. I work near the bar, and I get lunch there often. Please consider the cost on local business!

   Flag
3. 303
   Name: Albin Bell on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 304
   Name: Julie Stoehr on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 305
   Name: Greg Lanham on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 306
   Name: Mich Huff on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 307
   Name: Debbie Welch-Ambro on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 308
   Name: Portia Yiamouyiannis on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 309
   Name: Robert Rice on Dec 5, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 310
    Name: Jamie on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 311
    Name: Rick Kritzer on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 312
    Name: Holly Holdren on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 313
    Name: Deb McGuire on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 314
    Name: Nicole Rousseau on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: Reduction in parking will surely have a negative impact for businesses on Parsons Avenue. There must be another solution to traffic issues.

    Flag
15. 315
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 316
    Name: Jenny Linn on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: Speeding traffic up on Parsons Avenue will not bring more businesses and families to the area. We need to slow the traffic down, not speed it up.

    Flag
17. 317
    Name: Catherine Doran on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 318
    Name: Ken Flower on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: I am not in favor of decreasing on-street parking and believe it will negatively affect current and future businesses on Parsons' Avenue while hurting the long-term revitalization of this important corridor.

    Flag
19. 319
    Name: Page Kagafas on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 320
    Name: Ed Forman on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 321
    Name: Katie Harris O'Keefe on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 322
    Name: Chris Bondra on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 323
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 324
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 325
    Name: Tabitha on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 326
    Name: Raymond E Young on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 327
    Name: Ignatz Ziller on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 328
    Name: Sophia Linton on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 329
    Name: Angie Palmer on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 330
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 331
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 332
    Name: Clayton K Lowe on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: In some ways the massive redevelopment of Columbus is an exciting 'wow' experience - just as urban development was in its day. However, we're still recovering from that. Massive parts of cities were destroyed, along with the neighbors that were either lost or totally disconnected. The problem with massive development is the machines of destruction and construction, far outrace our human ability to forsee all of the devastating side-effects of what we're doing. Listen to the people out there who are sharing those concerns. Once the wreckers come, it's forever.

    Flag
33. 333
    Name: Thomas Feerick on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 334
    Name: Lauren Houck on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 335
    Name: Wendy Ake on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 336
    Name: Jaye Puckett on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 337
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 338
    Name: Alan Woods on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: we shop regularly on Parsons; as seniors, restricted parking would make this much more difficult. Why are the restrictions being propose?

    Flag
39. 339
    Name: Parker Norvell on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 340
    Name: Jim Maneri on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 341
    Name: Robert Rosenblum on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: As a former commercial developer, I know how devastating lack of parking and road work can absolutely destroy sales for many businesses impacted by decisions engineers make who don't take account of the livelyhood of surrounding businesses. Usually, improvements help businesses, but all retailers need visibility, access and parking. Sincerely, Robert Rosenblum

    Flag
42. 342
    Name: John Page on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 343
    Name: Patricia Marida on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments: The plan appears to be about increasing the speed the flow of traffic by eliminating backups when people want to turn left. In other words, yet another plan to put the automobile ahead of people and everything else. It’s a dead end, pun intended.

    Flag
44. 344
    Name: Don Rice on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 345
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 346
    Name: Stephanie Lynn on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 347
    Name: Dominique De Biasio on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 348
    Name: Spencer on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 349
    Name: Justin Sommer on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 350
    Name: Wendy H. Ungar on Dec 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 › »