Potton Against New Traveller Sites (PANTS)

Signatures 775 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 16 › »

1. 101
   Name: Geraldine Clark on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments: I feel that the sites should be scattered. Potton has already got a site other areas don,t.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments: It is extremely unrealistic and certainly unfair to expect Potton to sustain a further gypsy site. There is already more trouble than can be easily and successfully dealt with from the existing site. An unknown travelling fraternity would cause more friction with the existing families as it is known they cannot always co-exist.

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments: There are far to many sites suggested

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Doug Dawson on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Nikki Roberts on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Jamie Johnson on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Jamie Johnson on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Steven Johnson on Jan 25, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Beverley Hutchinson on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: The traveller site causes enough problems as it is. The police daren't even go up there on their own! And the council want us to have more sites.... This is just another example of Central Beds and its councillor's being completly out of touch with the people tha have to live in this town.

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: James Bartram on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Elliott Powers on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Samantha Allen on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: No more travellers in Potton!!!!!!!!!

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Daniel Redbond on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: There is already one site in Potton why should tax payers money be spent on another? spend the money on the pot holes!

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Tanya Worboys on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Roger Longweight on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: Potton has already suffered from crime and antisocial behaviour from gypsy site see high court judgement Winch v MBDC

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Sean Arkins on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Michael Horne on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Mr. Foley on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Sally-Ann Wiltshire on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Lucy Fitzwater on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Elain Lainy Barbet on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Nicki And Steve Newman on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: David on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: We moved into Potton for a peaceful rural community. There is already one site here why should we suffer more!! They have no respect for our community and to be frank as high tax payers we do not see why we should pay for those who do do not pay their way and abuse their surroundings, millions is invested by the council to improve their way of living yet genuine people are left at the bottom of the list because of beurocracy. enough is enough!!!!!. Children are frightened and cannot play in Potton without fear of being beaten up. There is no Police support because of the cuts and to be honest the Police appear to be scared of entering a site except in large numbers which is impossible at present, and I don't blame them!!!! They leave mess, disruption and disrespect everywhere they go. There is a high rate of crime (co-op, tescos the chemist and garage all turned over) many return to prison because it is nicer than their site (isolation involves taking their play station away!!!!) Why should a wonderful community that has already intergrated our over growing society be ruined. We also need to respect our wildlife and rural surroundings instead of filling it with caravans!!!!!!

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: How could they possibly consider putting more sites here when they are planning to build over one hundred houses near the garage. Talk about ruin a lovley community and rural surroundings. If the council go ahead I am moving and I am sure others will be,lower priced houses and less committed people in community. I am sick of working every day over 40 hours a week to support those who disrespect society. The government and councils need to wake up and listen to the majority of society who pay their wages , keep tham in a plush lifestyle and house. Perhaps they would like 2/3 sites on their doorstep

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: We already accommodate one traveller site in Potton. If more traveller sites are needed, they should be shared around fairly.

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Beany on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: we have enough, its time to say no!

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Robin. Wynde on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: We have one site already in Potton. M ore appropriate for other areas of the county to accommodate any extra need than more in or around our town.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Helen on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Jenny Pounce on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: I have never seen a more obvious abuse of position than by the 8 councillors on the planning committee. Disgraceful!

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Leonard Sandford on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: There is no infrastructure to accommodate another travellers site in a small village like Potton which would bring doctors surgery and local schools under great pressure.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Mark on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: The existing site in Potton has plenty of space. Not many people in the settled community, as we are called, have space to prepare cars for ram raids, or conceal a lorry involved in the death of a pedestrian. Cllrs need to be told - let this happen and I will vote against you

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Adrian Jones on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: If more Traveller sites are set up in or around Potton me and my family are moving out of the area. We would rather pay our Council Tax to a Council that supports its residents. I am not going to risk the well being or safety of my family.

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Laura Knibbs on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Tracey Horne on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: James Howarth on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: I completely agree. The Potton infrastructure is not capable of supporting any more residents of any kind traveller or not. Have you tried to get a same day appointment at the Doctors recently? Have you seen a police person after 5pm? Why is it Beds Council believe that Potton should support 2 or more sites when other towns have none? Why is it we in the east of the country have 24% of all travellers and Wales has none at all? Enough is enough.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: Part of the Governments stated planning strategy is for local people to have much more say in development plans for their area. This planning committee has already ridden roughshod over this with the proposed lage scale housing development on Biggleswade Road against the wishes of the Town Council representing the residents of Potton. Even a cursory inspection of the map of proposed sites shows a hugely disproportionate number in and around Potton and surrounding towns and villages. Surely it is time this planning committee takes account of local feelings in their proposals.

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: The infrastructure of the area will not support more sites in Potton or surrounding areas.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: A Dyason on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: It is outrageous that there are so many proposals for the Potton area when the services (roads, schools, GP surgery, shops etc) are insufficient to effectively support the current population and new homes being built

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: R J Piercy on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: one site in this community is enough . we do not want to be a dumping ground for these people

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Richard Bradshaw on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: I agree with this petition but also put any new sites on the councillors ward that have none so that it is evenly distributed

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: N Eady on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Nick Eady on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 16 › »