Potton Against New Traveller Sites (PANTS)

Signatures 774 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 16 › »

1. 1
   Name: Mark Amps on Jan 21, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Sharon Tonks on Jan 21, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2013

   Comments: I agree with all the above, and trust the correct action is taken

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Julie Graves on Jan 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Rachel Ince on Jan 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Zoe Taylor on Jan 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: David Robinson on Jan 22, 2013

   Comments: I believe we already accommodate our share of travellers in Potton and to add more is unfair

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Mark Oldfield on Jan 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: Potton is a small town consisting of people with a good community spirit, who value their local area, and any intention for any group of people to be accomodated in a way that brings a legacy of unlawfulness, environmental untidyness and discord with the communty in general will be most strongly contested.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Michelle Garner on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: I am against this travellers site, as we already have a site in potton and where this proposed site is, it is right on one of the main roads coming into Potton and near the park which is taking away the beauty and village feel of Potton.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Adam Wakeling on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: Wherever these people go they leave a wake of destruction and misery behind them. I and many other people have had bad experiences while these so called travellers have been in the local vicinity. We pay our taxes and obey the laws of government so we should we suffer when these people get away with what they do. It seems that the authorities do not want to know. This is why I am signing this petition.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: This will be the ruin of the area. I myself have avoided buying a house near to a site in the past. Helicopters always circle the one in Potton and a remote village does not need any nuicance or anything that will effect the security and well being of its residents, many elderly and vulnerable. No,No,NO to this!!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Amanda Kellett on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anthony Kellett on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Mark Jessop on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Gary Callaghan on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: no thank you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Julie Briggs on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Lesley Cartwright on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: As an ex-Pottonian , I believe that another site would be too much for the people of Potton today.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: James McGuinness on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: In the last 5 years Potton has grown our infrastructure hasn't when will it stop.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Stuart Shipp on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: I believe that additional pitches in Potton will not only adversely affect the community, but also it appears the council are willing to allow pitches on areas that they would not necessarily permit building houses.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: There are a number of new developments planned for Potton which will stretch the infrastructure. The proposed traveller site is large and will put further strain on town facilities. There is already an existing site in the town, isn't this enough?

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Nikki Jessop on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: ELIZABETH LITCHFIELD on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: No more travellers sites in Potton please!!!!!!

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: It is very unfair on Potton residents that multiple sites are being proposed in and around Potton. The site we already have is larger than what the new sites would be.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Nicola Hargreaves on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: Potton already accommodates 1 site, there should not be a concentration of sites in any one area in the county.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Matti Ince on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Cath Slattery on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Brendan Leigh on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: There as been no consultation with local residents and there appears to be an inbalance of provision of travellers sites across Central Beds. Localism should be considered and the views of the local communities and the Parish Council's fully considered and accepted. There seems to be total disregard and lack of respect from Central Beds in this matter

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: already got one site in potton !!!!! thats enough thanks

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: J Tuchscherer on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: We have had enough problems in the past with travellers in Potton and don't want any more.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: I believe that the proposals are disproportionately weighted against Sandy and its neighbours and also believe that our local infrastructure will struggle further to supply the needs of its residents. I believe that future wellbeing of our community will be adversely affected and that there has been a fundamental lack of respect, regard and moral consideration afforded to Sandy and its neighbours.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Alan.litchfield on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: no more sites pick another place please -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: DO NOT WANT MORE SITES

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Janet Wilkinson on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Russell Glen on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: Enough is well enough. We can just about cope with the existing camp. New travellers in the area will create havoc and the crime rate will rise again !

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anita Perry on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Mark Taylor on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Lynda on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: James Beard on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Ian Clements on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Jake on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: we have one site already , so leave us alone now we are doing are bit ,how comes cambridgeshire can say no !!!!!!! ,

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Jo M on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: We cannot support any more of these sites, we have our fair share surely?

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: I do not feel that it is necessary for additional traveller sites in and around Potton itself, the council has already provided one site which is situated in Common Road, built approximately 25 years ago. Consequently, I think this site is more than adequate for the capacity of Potton, taking into consideration it is a small town. Furthermore, I do not understand why the sites cannot be more widespread around Bedfordshire. Some towns in the county do not have even one site., which I think is unfair for Potton residents who are against more travellers and feel uncomfortable and unsafe with them living near them.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anna Saundery on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 16 › »