Signatures 141 total
-
51
Name: Avis Bridgers on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: Anonymous on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Beth Kricker on Jan 29, 2013Comments: Voter I.D. Is just another name for voter supprssion. It should be outlawed as unconstitutional .oFlag
-
54
Name: Beth Kricker on Jan 29, 2013Comments: Voyer I. D. Is un-American and violates the 13 and 14th Amendments. "we are not powerless.". This cannot pass. BethFlag
-
55
Name: Sandra Clemons on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Victoria Shea on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Julia Cleaver on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Diana H Hales on Jan 29, 2013Comments: Elections are not won by fraudulent votes...but by the power of the message. Save taxpayer money on this blind alley.Flag
-
59
Name: Lawrence Kessler on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Eleanor Cornog on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: DAN FRAZIER on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: Liz Cullington on Jan 29, 2013Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: Jennie DeLoach on Jan 29, 2013Comments: I urge you to not pass voter id regulations for the reasons stated in the above petition. This is an outrage!!!!! You are disenfrachizing 750,000 people in NC by doing this!!!!! Jennie DeLoach Chapel Hill, NCFlag
-
64
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
65
Name: Nancy Hillmer on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
66
Name: Karen Mallam on Jan 30, 2013Comments: We need to encourage all people to vote, not put barriers in their way.Flag
-
67
Name: Dolores Campbell on Jan 30, 2013Comments: Our new governor with Just a few weeks into office has already wasted taxpayer money by raising the salary of his new staff. Wast no more! Voter fraud seems to be coming from the voices in your head/heads.Flag
-
68
Name: Margaret B. Jackson on Jan 30, 2013Comments: I oppose any effort by the NC General Assembly to disenfranchise voters regardless of political affiliation. As a retired military veteran it is repugnant to think that what we fought to protect might be taken away.Flag
-
69
Name: E.W. Brooks on Jan 31, 2013Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Jack Buckingham on Jan 31, 2013Comments: Don't waste anymore of our money on this witch hunt, be smart how you spend itFlag
-
71
Name: Gary Smith on Feb 1, 2013Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Deborah Wechsler on Feb 3, 2013Comments:Flag
-
73
Name: Caroline McLaughlin on Feb 4, 2013Comments:Flag
-
74
Name: James W. Westmoreland on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: Joyce W Kachergis on Feb 5, 2013Comments: It is obvious that one of our political parties think that they cannot win fair and square so the resort to old timey methods of voter suppression.Flag
-
76
Name: Dolores Campbell on Feb 5, 2013Comments:Flag
-
77
Name: Leslie Elza on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Betty Huber on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
79
Name: Patricia B. Learned on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Martha Girolami on Feb 6, 2013Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: VirginiaPenley on Feb 6, 2013Comments: of special concern to me is the added cost of obtaining the documents to show a name change usually born only by women. these documents require a $10 fee in each case (poll tax) and may require the showing of the very photo ID that the woman is trying to qualify for before she can obtain them, a perfect 'catch 22'.Flag
-
82
Name: VirginiaPenley on Feb 6, 2013Comments: this ID bills requires women to document name changes, which cost $10 per certificate, a poll tax. it also requires the applicant already posess and show the very photo ID she is applying for, a 'catch 22'.Flag
-
83
Name: Michael D Strong on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Please don't waste my Taxpayer dollars on a problem that doesn't exist. Just say "No" to Voter ID.Flag
-
84
Name: Sarah Wittman on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
85
Name: Sandra Clemons on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
86
Name: Stanley Henshaw on Feb 10, 2013Comments: If you care about preventing voter mistakes and fraud, you should require absentee ballots to be notarized, not require photo ID for in-person voting.Flag
-
87
Name: Dyrrle G. Osborne on Feb 25, 2013Comments: The voter ID would cause many seniors not to vote and this is another "Jim Crow" sophisticated practice that is trying to be push.Flag
-
88
Name: Susan Pope on Feb 27, 2013Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Laura O'neal on Feb 27, 2013Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Belinda Anderson on Feb 27, 2013Comments: Happy to sign this LauraFlag
-
91
Name: Rosita Wiggins on Feb 27, 2013Comments: I oppose any kind of voter id in NC and the intent to discourage voters.Flag
-
92
Name: Gwendolyn Thorpe on Feb 27, 2013Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Barbara P. Harrison on Feb 28, 2013Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Mary E. Ward on Feb 28, 2013Comments: This has not been a major problem in our state; my driver's license and birth documents should be enough. Wasteful spending that could be used to reduce class sizes or purchase reading materials.Flag
-
95
Name: Charlotte Mizelle on Feb 28, 2013Comments: This is such an obvious way for the Republicans to eliminate many women and black voters It is shameful.Flag
-
96
Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2013Comments: Waste of precious funds at a time we need to be diligent with spending.Flag
-
97
Name: Linda Edwards on Feb 28, 2013Comments:Flag
-
98
Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2013Comments:Flag
-
99
Name: William R. Burchette on Feb 28, 2013Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Kemp Philips on Feb 28, 2013Comments:Flag