Oppose the Frederick/Carroll County Waste to Energy Facility

Signatures 917 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 19 › »

1. 151
   Name: Robert Gramm on Feb 21, 2013

   Comments: The proposed waste to energy incinerator should be rejected, it will harm our community in so many ways.

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Lee Hensley on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments: This project will cause only fiscal and environmental disaster.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Cheryl Wilhelm on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments: The project will not function as predicted economically

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Nicole Orr on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Sonya Goldstein on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments: Please do not locate an incinerator in our backyard! We already have an F rating for air quality. Measures to be taken to improve not degrade!

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Beverly A Brown on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Bonnie Markward on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Fred Dickinson on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: This is the wrong solution to our solid waste disposal problem. Reduce our use, recycle what we do use.

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Neil Seldman on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Tiffany Turney on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Tammy Mangan on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: One only needs to look to Germany as the perfect example of how to dispose of waste and sustain healthy communities. Incineration is 19th century and not what I want in my community.

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Julia Cubit on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Josh Hatkin on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: Frederick County needs to cancel this project. The waste material can be sold to various re-cycling companies to generate $$. then Frederick County will have a steady stream of income-not a large stream but some income

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: This is both fiscally and environmentally damaging to both Frederick and Carroll Counties. I can't believe there is anyone who still thinks it is a good idea!

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: MaryAnn. Gregory on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: The incinerator is a very bad idea, both financially and environmentally! Reuse and recycle instead.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Larissa Melnyk on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: John F. Flynn on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: I live and work in Frederick County and believe the incinerator project will move Frederick in exactly the opposite direction than what is needed now more than ever. We need to reduce waste and recycle instead of continuing to waste resources and money on waste disposal methods such as incineration which only pollute, poison our environment, and further delay serious efforts to solve the problem permanently and sustainably with policies and research to redirect the majority of our waste into useful recycled products. A 30 year, 3 billion dollar detour which will continue to further degradie our environment, quality of life, and financial well being is a terrible mistake. Anyone who looks at the facts can see this. Please, Do not approve the air, water, and land permits. Thank you John Flynn 7194 Meadowbrooke Dr Frederick 21702

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: George Niles on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments: The financials do not make sense and the risk of the finances exploding on the taxpayers is very high. For all the effort on the environmental issue of clean air and waterwithin State government , ignoring the potential pollution of the Potomac and Bay along with the air is not prudent.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Sue Sickle on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Kathryn Ruud on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Sharon Garlena on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments: No one wants that polluting inferno 1.5 miles from their home much less in the state--wake BoCC.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: ERnest J.P. Muhly on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments: Destroying valuable resources and at the same time polluting the air, land and water is not what environmental protection is about.

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Lisa Nachman on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Sandra Hagen on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Jane Sachs JD, PhD on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Sandra Hagen on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments: Homeowner less than 3 miles away of proposed site.

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Claudia Lewis on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments: We should be using alternative energy forms. I very much disagree that waste to energy is a tier one solution to our energy needs; the potential for major health issues is too great.

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Carol Comunale on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Beverly C Horsley on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments: The Buckeystown History District is about 2 miles for the planned incinerator site. The traffic on 85 will be 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It will destroy our community. Our homes are historic and need to be protected for future generations.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Geoffrey Hemgen on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Bob Bray on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Michael Sodos on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments: WTE will cause an increase in asthma suffering in Frederick County, and the BOCC does not give a damn about anyone's health concerns!!

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Kathy Salter on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Suzanne Marsteller on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Carolyn Snyder on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Christine Katz on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Susan Blaney on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments: No incinerator.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Christine Katz on Mar 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Melissa Medwid on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Elizabeth Carey on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Louise Cotulla on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Mary Jo Russo on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Sondra Edwards on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Lisa Cooper on Mar 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 19 › »