Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 917 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 19 »

  1. 101
    Name: Pamela Simmons on Jan 31, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: Amanda Angleberger on Jan 31, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Jessica S on Jan 31, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: Jessica Reynolds on Jan 31, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Karen Morris on Jan 31, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Mia Thuro on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Laura Prunczik York on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Patricia Thuro on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments: We must stop this
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: Megan Dewese on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Sam Schumacher on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: This incinerator would be terrible for Frederick County and would cause significant environmental and health problems for nearby residents.
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Lauren Thuro on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Corey Thuro on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Ben Carr on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Joshua Ballard on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: Frederick is beautiful! Even as Montgomery County farmland is dwindling, Frederick County has done such a good job preserving it's farming heritage, and this project would destroy all that. And the petitioner makes an excellent, excellent point; Frederick's natural beauty is a huge draw for tourism, and it's the reason I myself make the forty-five minute drive there with friends all the time. By building this incinerator, you'll be destroying one of the main reasons people come visit your county. Please do the right thing and stop this project.
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Benjamin Patton on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: Frederick is such a beautiful area, I'd hate to think of it being reduced to anything less.
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Livija Kelly on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Rebecca Ballard on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: David Herman on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: John Wells on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Mary McQuillen on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments: Please DENY the permits!
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Sue Sickle on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: David Sickle on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments: this is a travesty that we would even think about allowing this environmental disaster to take place.
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Gary A Thuro Jr. on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments: This is a bad financial and environmental deal for Frederick County. Lets become a leader in waste management not a follower of bad public policy.
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Brian Code on Feb 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Joyce Hugo on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: oppose!!
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: Lucy Poole on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Angela Colletti on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Sean Sharp on Feb 6, 2013
    Comments: Our environment is to precious for these kind of hastily made and hard-headed decisions!
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Peggy Houston on Feb 7, 2013
    Comments: NOT IN MY BACK YARD!
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Todd And Lisa Loveless on Feb 8, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: Kenneth Weiss on Feb 11, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Cristina Frey on Feb 11, 2013
    Comments: Thank you for doing this. Our future generations will remember you.
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: MARCO FOGELBACH on Feb 12, 2013
    Comments: There are better ways to make energy than by creating consumer goods only to burn them. $30B can be put to better use by researching how used tires and other toxin generating solid waste can be recycled.
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Diana Swanson on Feb 12, 2013
    Comments: This must not be built.
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Yda Morales on Feb 13, 2013
    Comments: I am so against the construction of the incinearator
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Cathy Lipton on Feb 13, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Hannah Waldhorn on Feb 15, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Mary Weiss-Waldhorn on Feb 15, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Steve Waldhorn on Feb 15, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Adam Fogle on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Gary J Thuro on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments: $ 3 Billion to poison our air and water while setting the county up for bankruptcy to solve a problem that doesn't exist...Termite This Contract
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Robert B. Holstein on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: David Sickle on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments: I think this is a disgraceful proposal by greedy politicians who are not considering the environmental ramifications of their negligent actions
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Jack Lynch on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments: wasteful, costly, polluting
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Gary Thuro Jr. on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments: BOCC put an end to this poor public policy decision. Its a waste of tax dollars and an environmental nightmare.
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Mia Thuro on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: Stephanie Smith on Feb 20, 2013
    Comments: You can't go thru with this Please!!! Stop this while you can
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 19 »

Sponsored links