Signatures 4967 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 100 › »
-
151
Name: Gerald Darcie on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: Mary Ellen Meyers on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Linda Browne on Apr 26, 2009Comments: I am an OT providing service to persons with traumatic brain injury. I fully support the arguments outlined in this petition. These changes would benefit only the insurers. The public would have no idea of the negative impact of these changes unless they had previously been involved in a claim. There must be other ways to monitor the cost effectiveness of treatment which is the direction in which changes should be made.Flag
-
155
Name: Sarah Sang Tran on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
156
Name: Robin May on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
157
Name: Ellen Chizen on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
158
Name: Stephanie Coughler on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
159
Name: Julie Manley on Apr 26, 2009Comments: As a physiotherapist, I believe this would be an incredible disservice to Ontarians. Without enough physiotherapy, clients will have more physical disability and decrease the possibility of returning to meaningful work.Flag
-
160
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments: These proposed changes will not only adversely impact on those who are injured, but the entire public health care system. Already, there is a shortage of specialized services for those who sustain brain injuries and this will fall upon an already overtaxed healthcare system. Moreover, most communities do no have publicly funded psychosocial counselling services for people with brain injuries due to cutbacks in psychology, social work, and mental health services. Where are these people supposed to get help Having physicians oversee the rehabilitaiton process does not make sense, especially since there is already a shortage of family physicians. As most family physicians have little experience with the unique challenges facing people with brain injuries, it is also unclear how they will make appropriate rehab decisions on behalf of their patients.Flag
-
161
Name: Marcia Pinchefsky on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
162
Name: Bev Krahn on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
163
Name: Patricia A. Bourdeau, Ph.D., C.Psych. on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
164
Name: Carol Moore, MSW, PhD on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
165
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments: I agree with the sentiments of this petition.Flag
-
166
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
167
Name: Don Kunkel on Apr 26, 2009Comments: A $2,000 cap on assessment fees is a "knee jerk" reaction and a poor attempt to reduce overall assessment fees. This cap will only scare away highly professional and skilled medical professionals thus causing the entire system to implode. There are more reasonable alternatives that can be discussed.Flag
-
168
Name: Dave Hutchins Gaylor on Apr 26, 2009Comments: I am a person still dealing with the effects of brain injury 8 years post a car accident from someonewho T-boned me after going through a stop sign. I would not have recovered anywhere near to the extent that I have nor would my family had coped as well without the case management, physio, OT, SLP and pyschologist therapy I had. That would not have been possible with the new limits being suggested now.Flag
-
169
Name: Don Kunkel on Apr 26, 2009Comments: A $2,000 cap on assessment fees is a "knee jerk" reaction and a poor attempt to reduce overall assessment fees. This cap will only scare away highly professional and skilled medical professionals thus causing the entire system to implode. There are more reasonable alternatives that can be discussed.Flag
-
170
Name: Dr. Alvin Harvey Shapiro on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
171
Name: Irene Fairles on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
172
Name: Aimee Hayes on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
173
Name: Dr. Alison J. Longhorn-Geddes, C.Psych. on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
174
Name: Joy Beazley on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
175
Name: Bill Furchner on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
176
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
177
Name: Caron Gan on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
178
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
179
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
180
Name: Dr. Sid Freedman on Apr 26, 2009Comments: Many Ontarians do not have a physician and even if they do, their physicians do not have enough time to provide the services that other professionals are currently providing to people injured in automobile accidents. Reduced funding means reduced services for rehabilitation of injured people. Insurers could save money if they would reduce the number and costs of insurers examinations, which often cost more than the treatment plans they are refusing to fund.Flag
-
181
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
182
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
183
Name: Kathy Wheeler Sullivan on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
185
Name: Leah Davidson on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
186
Name: Rob Clendenning on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
187
Name: Mary Ann Peloso on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
188
Name: Josie Germano on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
189
Name: Robin Kadanoff on Apr 26, 2009Comments: I do not agree with the proposed changes that FSCO is recommending. I think they will negatively impact non-catatrophically injured persons as noted above.Flag
-
190
Name: Jordana Phillips on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
191
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
192
Name: Lori Eisen on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
193
Name: Melinda Cox on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
194
Name: Samantha Crow on Apr 26, 2009Comments: Physiotherapists should be responsible for assessment.Flag
-
195
Name: Martin Wiener on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: Paula Hilborn on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
197
Name: Rita Lenhardt on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
198
Name: Kathlee Kirkham on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
199
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
200
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2009Comments:Flag