Signatures 1733 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, ... 35 › »
-
351
Name: Shelly Bahl on Nov 27, 2012Comments: Artist, educator & NYT subscriberFlag
-
352
Name: Michael Scoggins on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
353
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
354
Name: Rehema Barber on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
355
Name: Arlen Austin on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
356
Name: Margaret Olin on Nov 27, 2012Comments: These are flatfooted at best. Even a phrase like ""white artists like Picasso, Kurt Schwitters, Marcel Duchamp, David Smith and Robert Rauschenberg" rankles and puzzles. Ken Johnson surely knows better than this. He can surely be held to a higher standard.Flag
-
357
Name: Ken Wissoker on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
358
Name: Elana Mann on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
359
Name: Andrew Barron on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
360
Name: Mamie Holst on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
361
Name: Julian Gilbert-Davis on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
362
Name: Cody Campbell on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
363
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
364
Name: Amy A on Nov 27, 2012Comments: possible a jerk?Flag
-
365
Name: Amanda Burnham on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
366
Name:
Hunter O'Hanian on Nov 27, 2012
Comments:Flag -
367
Name: Dont Rhine on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
368
Name: Marion Callis on Nov 27, 2012Comments: Mr. Johnson showed the limits of his art history education with this article, and has the opportunity now to fill in his blanks, and publicly acknowledge them. If he does that, he is forgiven, as far as I'm concerned! His crime would be to let the article stand uncorrected.Flag
-
369
Name: Charisse Weston on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
370
Name: Rachel Appel on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
371
Name: Kenny Rivero on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
372
Name: Jessica Dickinson on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
373
Name: Hannah Alpert on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
374
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
375
Name:
Judith A. McElwee Scull on Nov 27, 2012
Comments:Flag -
376
Name: Gustavus Stadler on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
377
Name: Knut Asdam on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
378
Name: Dan Cameron on Nov 27, 2012Comments: I feel strongly that this is not about 'punishing' an individual critic (Ken Johnson) for a poorly researched & sloppy review, but about drawing attention to the fact that the NY Times apparently feels that a certain cavalier attitude is OK in reviewing visual artists of color, while they wouldn't dream of permitting the same lax standards in their performing arts reviews.Flag
-
379
Name: Nate Hess on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
380
Name: Beth Turk on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
381
Name:
Janean Williams on Nov 27, 2012
Comments:Flag -
382
Name: Alexandra Chang on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
383
Name: Aubrey Anable on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
384
Name: Margaret Porter Troupe on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
385
Name:
Sarah Cooper on Nov 27, 2012
Comments:Flag -
386
Name: Fred Moten on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
387
Name: Lilian Dregalla on Nov 27, 2012Comments: I agree wholeheartedly with "Johnson replays stereotypes of inscrutable blackness and inadequate femininity in the guise of serious inquiry, but that inquiry never happens." It's a lazy piece, so unconscious of its own assumptions it's startling.Flag
-
388
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2012Comments: Ny Times critics NEED DESPERATELY to be kept in checkFlag
-
389
Name: T. M. on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
390
Name: Holly Zausner on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
391
Name: T. M. on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
392
Name: Caroline Wells Chandler on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
393
Name: Alex G on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
394
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
395
Name: Alisa Ochoa on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
396
Name: Yonni Walker on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
397
Name: Kaela Noel on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
398
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
399
Name: Evie Falci on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag
-
400
Name: Kris Mandelbaum on Nov 27, 2012Comments:Flag