Signatures 1732 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, ... 35 › »
-
1151
Name: Candice Hopkins on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1152
Name: Susannah Schoff on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1153
Name: Eungie Joo on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1154
Name: C. Ondine Chavoya on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1155
Name: Merion Estes on Nov 29, 2012Comments: I join the many voices in protest of the attitudes expressed in the reviews. Deeply disturbing and so very dated.Flag
-
1156
Name: Aaqil Ka on Nov 29, 2012Comments: i'm not surprised...Flag
-
1157
Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1158
Name: Mensa Kondo on Nov 29, 2012Comments: sigh*Flag
-
1159
Name: Stephanie Lai on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1160
Name: Sarah Fleming on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1161
Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1162
Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1163
Name: Defne Tutus on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1164
Name: Alexis Pauline Gumbs on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1165
Name: Branden Jacobs-Jenkins on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1166
Name: John Corso on Nov 29, 2012Comments: Assistant Professor of Art History, Oakland UniversityFlag
-
1167
Name: Janie Tijerina on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1168
Name: Molly A. Woolsey on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1169
Name: Gregory A. Butler on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1170
Name: A. Suparak on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1171
Name: Sadia Shirazi on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1172
Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1173
Name: Jenna Weiss on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1174
Name:
John Muse on Nov 29, 2012
Comments:Flag -
1175
Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1176
Name: Duane Deterville on Nov 29, 2012Comments: It is reprehensible that the type of anachronistic eurocentrism and cultural chauvinism exhibited by Ken Johnson's review are still given a forum in the New York Times.Flag
-
1177
Name: ChloƩ Dietz on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1178
Name: W. Keith Brown on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1179
Name: Adeeba Deterville on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1180
Name: Sara Krajewski on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1181
Name: Michael Young on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1182
Name: Karlynne Ejercito on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1183
Name: Isobel Crittenden on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1184
Name: Diana Carr on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1185
Name: Suzanne Szucs on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1186
Name: Anjana Mebane-Cruz on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1187
Name: Dan Zanes on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1188
Name: Patrick Earl Hammie on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1189
Name: Elijah on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1190
Name: Mana Tahaie on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1191
Name: Sean Cazzell on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1192
Name: Alicia Chester on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1193
Name: Neil Rivas on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1194
Name: Francesco Spampinato on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1195
Name: Valborg Fletre Linn on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1196
Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1197
Name: Cinque Hicks on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1198
Name: Cauleen Smith on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1199
Name: Erin Dziedzic on Nov 29, 2012Comments:Flag
-
1200
Name: Octavio Zaya on Nov 29, 2012Comments: Would Mr. Johnson accept a judgement on his writing following his own logic? What about something going like this: "Mr. Johnson is so uninformed, and writes so poorly and with that racist and sexist bent that characterizes his so-called criticism because he is a white old fart resentful of those he thinks don't deserve the attention he should have." I'm sure you like it A LOT, Mr. Johnson. Don't you?Flag