Signatures 31 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Stella & John Penizotto on Sep 17, 2008Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2008Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Stella Vespari on Sep 17, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Ted Barbuto on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Anonymous on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Greta McDowell on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: GEORGE GONCALVES on Sep 18, 2008Comments: Absoloutely, child care in the ealry years is a critical step in a childs development. And these grants are imperative to keeping the costs lower, so that families can afford it. This should be at the top of the list in priorities that NY State has every single year.Flag
-
8
Name: Jill Lane on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Rose Skinner on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Jennifer Scott on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Jonathan Desimone on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Lindsay Bailey on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Anonymous on Sep 18, 2008Comments: Child care is a struggle for every family - not just poor working families. Even young professionals who by definition would not be considered in poverty are struggling with the high costs.Flag
-
14
Name: Amanda Roach on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Tammy Erler on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Sep 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Abigail Istvan on Sep 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: David Baird on Sep 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Rebecca Powers on Sep 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Elvira Torres on Sep 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Casandra Musolino on Sep 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Dale Domros on Sep 20, 2008Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Diane Domros on Sep 20, 2008Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Bailey C. on Sep 20, 2008Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Jenna on Sep 20, 2008Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Mark on Sep 21, 2008Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Sep 22, 2008Comments: Funding needs to remain intact for the birth to 4 year old programs. The financial impact on children who are not proprely serviced during this time will only increase the funding that will be required to catch them up when they get to a UPK program and have not mastered developmental milestones and had intervention when they are lacking in areas. This will set them up for failure as they are put into the school system when intervention could have played a vital role when catching issues form birth - 4. It will cost taxpayers more money to undo this in the future. Why would those who need assitance most- children be cut from funding.Flag
-
28
Name: Anonymous on Sep 23, 2008Comments: Stop Taking The Money From CHILDREN!Flag
-
29
Name: Katie Meinhold on Sep 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Alyssa Rose on Oct 7, 2008Comments:Flag
Page: 1