Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 1,902

 

# NameTownComments
1 Ben Folley
2 Anna Liddle
3 Ben SoffaLondon
4 Rick WaymanLondon
5 Jenny MaxwellLeintwardineNuclear weapons are immoral and cannot be used without breaking International Humanitarian Law. There is no point in possessing them unless it is intended to use them.
6 Shilpa ShahCambridge
7 Julia LardenBirmingham
8 kate holcombeevesham
9 Dave QuinnenWest Bromwich
10 Alan WilkieEdinburghSecurity for the UK will be most strengthened by major progress towards multilateral nuclear disarmament through the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty process. The decision to renew Trident must be reversed as a contribution to the negotiation of a Nuclear Weapons Convention.
11 Richard FolleyCambridge
12 Jenny LennoxManchester
13 Hazel NealBirmingham
14 Joe SturgeMalvern
15 Richard TetlowBirminghamWaste of money and of opportunity to show world peace leadership
16 Caroline CharltonBirmingham
17 FINLEYBIRMINGHAM
18 Peter WilliamsOxford
19 Louise HutchinsLondon
20 Harriet MartinBirminghamThe threats today are from terrorism and global warming. Nuclear weapons take huge amounts of money which could be much, much better spent on renewable energy sources.
21 Sarah TevershamBirmingham
22 Lorna WaiteEdinburghThe Scottish Government has voted in opposition to the renewal of trident and should have staus as an observer nation in its own right at any future talks.
23 RowennaBala
24 Dominic Lewissidcup
25 ulla GrantBirmingham
26 Ian GrantBirmingham
27 Simon TuckerKIngs Langley
28 janetmoirbirmingham
29 luke charlesammanford
30 Valerie VenessLondon
31 Sue BergerSouthamptonWhy is money made available to creating more weapons of mass destruction when in other areas such as Healthcare vital funds are missing?
32 D. RothwellLondon
33 KittyG-SMiddlesbroughWe need to set an example on nuclear non-proliferation
34 Charles WicksteedBarnet
35 Anonymousbarnard castle
36 Phil Brand.London.No Trident - fund the NHS and education instead.
37 howard whiteipswich
38 Christopher SteadCrowborough
39 Garrath EllershawHorncastle
40 bronwen thomaslondon
41 Emma MusgraveMuch Hadham
42 mark mileyderby
43 Claire PoynerLondonDemanding that other countries do not develop nuclear weapons whilst continuing to develop our own is hypocritical to say the least. We must do what we promised - abandon our own WMD and do it now not at some point in the distant future!
44 Julie CookWoodbridge
45 Stephen BlackKettering
46 Michael SackiinLeicesterI ask the US and UK to stop bullying other countries to abandon their nuclear aspirations until the UK had got rid of its own nuclear weapons and nuclear power installations.
47 Peter JacksonYork
48 Anonymousleeds
49 Lewis StewartBristolRenewal of Trident is unnecessary and strategically misplaced in 2007. It is indefensible ethically, both in terms of the destructive potential of these weapons, and of the numerous better ways in which its huge cost could be spent. To spend up to £80 billion on Trident represents an almost parodically bad sense of priorities. The UK now has an opportunity to take what would come to be regarded as a historic, even visionary step, and become the first nuclear weapon-holding state to disarm. I believe that in time the international respect engendered by this will more than compensate for any loss of status among the big boys when we don't have the big toys - that loss is the only real reason why the politicians are reluctant to forgo their WMDs. Do not renew Trident - we don't need it!
50 Sue RobertsBristolOne cannot disarm whilst re-arming. The way forward is forwards.

 

Signatures | Total: 1,902