Signatures 1985 total
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
5
Name: Jenny Maxwell on Aug 3, 2007Town: LeintwardineComments: Nuclear weapons are immoral and cannot be used without breaking International Humanitarian Law. There is no point in possessing them unless it is intended to use them.Flag
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
10
Name: Alan Wilkie on Aug 4, 2007Town: EdinburghComments: Security for the UK will be most strengthened by major progress towards multilateral nuclear disarmament through the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty process. The decision to renew Trident must be reversed as a contribution to the negotiation of a Nuclear Weapons Convention.Flag
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
15
Name: Richard Tetlow on Aug 7, 2007Town: BirminghamComments: Waste of money and of opportunity to show world peace leadershipFlag
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
20
Name: Harriet Martin on Aug 9, 2007Town: BirminghamComments: The threats today are from terrorism and global warming. Nuclear weapons take huge amounts of money which could be much, much better spent on renewable energy sources.Flag
- 21
-
22
Name: Lorna Waite on Aug 10, 2007Town: EdinburghComments: The Scottish Government has voted in opposition to the renewal of trident and should have staus as an observer nation in its own right at any future talks.Flag
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
-
31
Name: Sue Berger on Aug 15, 2007Town: SouthamptonComments: Why is money made available to creating more weapons of mass destruction when in other areas such as Healthcare vital funds are missingFlag
- 32
-
33
Name: KittyG-S on Aug 18, 2007Town: MiddlesbroughComments: We need to set an example on nuclear non-proliferationFlag
- 34
- 35
-
36
Name: Phil Brand. on Aug 19, 2007Town: London.Comments: No Trident - fund the NHS and education instead.Flag
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
-
43
Name: Claire Poyner on Aug 21, 2007Town: LondonComments: Demanding that other countries do not develop nuclear weapons whilst continuing to develop our own is hypocritical to say the least. We must do what we promised - abandon our own WMD and do it now not at some point in the distant future!Flag
- 44
- 45
-
46
Name: Michael Sackiin on Aug 21, 2007Town: LeicesterComments: I ask the US and UK to stop bullying other countries to abandon their nuclear aspirations until the UK had got rid of its own nuclear weapons and nuclear power installations.Flag
- 47
- 48
-
49
Name: Lewis Stewart on Aug 21, 2007Town: BristolComments: Renewal of Trident is unnecessary and strategically misplaced in 2007. It is indefensible ethically, both in terms of the destructive potential of these weapons, and of the numerous better ways in which its huge cost could be spent. To spend up to £80 billion on Trident represents an almost parodically bad sense of priorities. The UK now has an opportunity to take what would come to be regarded as a historic, even visionary step, and become the first nuclear weapon-holding state to disarm. I believe that in time the international respect engendered by this will more than compensate for any loss of status among the big boys when we don't have the big toys - that loss is the only real reason why the politicians are reluctant to forgo their WMDs. Do not renew Trident - we don't need it!Flag
-
50
Name: Sue Roberts on Aug 21, 2007Town: BristolComments: One cannot disarm whilst re-arming. The way forward is forwards.Flag