Stop the Las Vegas Water Grab

Signatures 562 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 12 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: J Brooke Fairbanks on Mar 6, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Marjorie Lanthier on Mar 7, 2009

   Comments: Conservation in Las Vegas is the answer and should be a no-brainer. Shame on the Bureau of Land Management.

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Pamela Voves on Mar 7, 2009

   Comments: This plan will be devasting to the landscape, to the flora and fauna that depend upon this groundwater and the springs and waterways it feeds. Agriculture will also suffer and negatively impact local economies. Tourism to Las Vegas will also suffer as Americans, Canadians, and other nations become aware of this travesty. In this economic climate, most are cutting back on travel and other entertainment/leisure expenses. I question, as would most moral people, this heinous project.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 9, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Lynds Pickett on Mar 9, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: L. Cameron Mosher, Ph.D. on Mar 9, 2009

   Comments: The problem in the desert west is that we are MINING the groundwater! If we continue to increase population AND want lawns, phreatofitic trees, swimming pools, and artificial lakes in cities like Las Vegas, and still want to have any rural life at all, and still provide downstream water for the lower basin states, we are living in a fantasy! The solution is to limit by law how we use the desert rainfall that refills the streams and aquifers instead of robbing it from one part to another. This whole deal is IMPOSSIBLE TO SUSTAIN!

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Linda Radford on Mar 9, 2009

   Comments: This should not be allowed to happen!

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: William D. Thomson on Mar 9, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Linda Stone on Mar 11, 2009

    Comments: Please drill wells in Utah for Neveda

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Walter Barbuck on Mar 20, 2009

    Comments: A good reference for this fight is the peer reviewed article in the Sept 07 issue of the scientific journal "BioScience" by the lead author Dr James E Deacon - "Fueling Population Gowth in Las Vegas......"

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Ken Goldsmith on Mar 25, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Launce Rake on Mar 26, 2009

    Comments: Stop the Grab!!!

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Karen Duffy on Mar 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Mark Balcom on Mar 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Scott Dalman on Mar 31, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 4, 2009

    Comments: Its terrible and greedy. I guess when the area looks like the Sahara and we are all thirsty, people will take notice. It is shameful to distroy such a beautiful area so someone can water their lawn. It is a desert! Wake up!

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Susan Church on Apr 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Angela Bell on Apr 15, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Elisabeth Schoepflin on May 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: John H. Pilarski on May 26, 2009

    Comments: Although I am not a resident of Nevada (actually Milwaukee, WI), I have visited the Great Basin National Park, areas along the way from Las Vegas, and surrounding communities (along highways 375, 318, 6, 50, and 93) a number of times and fully agree with the positions of the Great Basin Water Network.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Leslie Gertie on Jun 23, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Mickey Settlemire on Jul 7, 2009

    Comments: While not a resident of the great basis area, I feel this action will affect other parts of the country with their own water issues.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Chuck Sindelar on Jul 18, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Cheryl Hollings on Jul 28, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: KaraLee Sines on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments: Protect our survival. This is closer than we think!

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: John Riddle III on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Kristen Parker on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Jennifer on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Stephanie Sharp on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments: Please explore and institute conservation methods prior to opening new drilling which would have potentially harmful effects on surrounding the environment, including animal habitat and rural communities.

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Emily Box on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Laurie Chancellor on Jul 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Aliya Summers on Jul 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Laura Garabedian on Jul 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Michael on Aug 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Bernard P McEnany Jr on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: I have lived most of my nearly 60 years on the Wasatch Front and have seen air quality diminish since i was growing up in the 50 and 60s. If the pipeline does happen I certainly do not want to live downwind of any potentional Harry Reid Dustbowl . Worst case could be a disaster in the making for western Utah and the Wasatch Front as well.

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Patricia Medina on Aug 6, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 9, 2009

    Comments: I disagree with putting the needs of one population over the needs of another. The Snake Valley is a stunningly beautiful area that does not need to be decimated so that Las Vegas can continue to grow. If Las Vegas needs more water, they need to find a way to get it without hurting rural Nevada/Utah.

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 12, 2009

    Comments: I am a former White Pine resident and I can tell you I am miffed by the actions of the SNWA. What gives them the right to confiscate water from the rural counties so that they can have fancy fountains and acres of grass. I have written several letters to Tracy Taylor (water engineer for Nevada) expressing my disappointment in. The next hearing is supposedly in two years as Mr. Taylor is currently on medical leave. I am donating $10.00 to help you in the legal fight. Good luck.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Aaron Littlefield on Aug 17, 2009

    Comments: The Great Basin is one of the greatest natural wonders in this country (not to mention the world). This livelihood, lifestyle, and vast frontier of the Great Basin must be protected at all costs. The lifeblood of the Great Basin is the water. Protection of the Great Basin starts with protecting the water from unstustainable desert urban growth.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Vicky Newman on Aug 18, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Elroy J. Gomes on Aug 20, 2009

    Comments: The pipe line should come from the colombia river between Washington and Oregon, all that water down stream from the dam goes out to the ocean, route that water to leak mead and leak tahou

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Kent Herrick on Sep 6, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 8, 2009

    Comments: I agree that the SNWA pipeline in Great Basin is a wasteful idea, that offers poor results.

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Morgan K. Larsen on Sep 24, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Linda Rubens on Sep 26, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 12 › »