Signatures 675 total
-
1
Name: Rose Strickland on Apr 23, 2008Comments: Very bad project. Glad you're fighting it!Flag
-
2
Name: Susan Lynn on Apr 23, 2008Comments: Yes, I want to sign on. Petitions ought to go to the SNWA Board as well. Thanks for doing this!Flag
-
3
Name: Dennis Ghiglieri on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Iris Thornton on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Launce Rake on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Rupert Steele on Apr 23, 2008Comments: Protect the Great Basin from drying up and help keep the Great Basin fragile ecosystem from irreversible harm and injury by denying SNWA water project.Flag
-
7
Name: Terry Marasco on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Gwen Augusten on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Virginia M. Sanchez on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Ken Hill on Apr 23, 2008Comments: Denuding Snake Valley will cause major dust storms that will extend to the Wasatch Front, potentially affecting health and the ski industry.Flag
-
11
Name: Kylie McCollough on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Dawn Boulware on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Gwen Reiman on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Kim Richardson on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: James E. Deacon on Apr 23, 2008Comments: The public interest is best served by ensuring sustainable development. 40 years of hydrological research has shown that the proposed groundwater development project is unsustainable. Climate change will produce reduced precipitation, therefore reduced aquifer recharge. Therefore, the project can only become increasingly unsustainable in the future. Las Vegas, East Central Nevada, and the entire state will suffer much less environmental and financial damage if required to develop within the limits imposed by resources (in this case water resources).Flag
-
16
Name: Alana Heath on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Willy Richardson on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Tonia Harvey on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Jo Anne Garrett on Apr 23, 2008Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Katie Fournier on Apr 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Katie Fournier on Apr 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Bob Frisby on Apr 24, 2008Comments: Las Vegas has no sustainable income base other than services or gamblng. They are betting all the water from Central Nevada and Eastern Utah that Las Vegas will keep growing as it has in the past. The economys of Las Vegas is not worth the wager they are willing to make. What happens if Las Vagas has all the water and no growth SNWA still has all the power and control!!!!Flag
-
23
Name: Ed Alder on Apr 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Bob Brister on Apr 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Nomi Sheppard on Apr 24, 2008Comments: i think las vegas has brilliant minds that can come up with innovative solutions for conserving water. in fact, they could be the world leader on this global crisis!!!Flag
-
26
Name: Genevieve Fields on Apr 24, 2008Comments: Being a nativer american, I feel water is a very important resource to all creatures and if God wanted water in Las Vegas he would have put water in Las Vegas. Leave the water alone.Flag
-
27
Name: John R. Fields on Apr 24, 2008Comments: When is Vagas going to wakeup They live in a dessert, they should slow the flow and save H2'O, And stop the growth.Flag
-
28
Name: Esther Rogers on Apr 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Esther Rogers on Apr 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Ann Brauer on Apr 25, 2008Comments: Bad, bad, bad idea. As someone once said, it's a desert out there. Desert communities need to live within local resources, especially when it comes to water.Flag
-
31
Name: Michael McClure on Apr 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Scot Rutledge on Apr 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Adriana Blake on Apr 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Dean Wm. Draper on Apr 28, 2008Comments: Exporting water from one basin to another is an egregious affront to nature, no matter where it happens. The needs, or wants, of Las Vegas do not outweigh the needs of the residents of the Snake Valley.Flag
-
35
Name: Earl Lewis on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Las Vegas should look at running a pipeline to the ocean, instead of stopping future growth in rural Utah and Nevada, they should try sucking the ocean dry..Flag
-
36
Name: Keith Hill on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Make them conserve before others are devastated - not to mention who knows how this might impact the lands in the West. We don't need any more oops - who'd a thunk it would hurt.Flag
-
37
Name: Lori Anderson on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Cathy Wilcock on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Monica on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Las Vegas can do so much more to preserve vital resources.Flag
-
42
Name: Scott Anderson on Apr 29, 2008Comments: It would be a tragedy to allow the greed of developers and speculators to destroy the unique desert and culture of Western Utah and Eastern Nevada. We must all watch the how the politicos vote on this issue and remove from office all that promote or do not stand against this violation of the rights of these local citizens and destruction of their way of life.Flag
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Cecil Garland on Apr 29, 2008Comments: We have no surplus water in Snake Valley. Giving Las Vegas more water is like giving a drunk another drink.Flag
-
46
Name: Annette Garland on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Las Vegas needs to live within their means as the rest of us do. They need to go to the ocean now. It is the only answer.Flag
-
47
Name: Ann Colby on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Dr. Gordon B. Childs on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Troy Holzer on Apr 29, 2008Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Randy Faber on Apr 29, 2008Comments: Every alternative to the Las Vegas plan has much more merit and less cost without the destruction of existing wildlife and communities.Flag