Signatures 159 total
-
151
Name: Stacia Arlint on Dec 10, 2009Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: Anonymous on Dec 31, 2009Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Kelly on Jan 11, 2010Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Sulpnff on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: Melissa Pate on Apr 28, 2010Comments: This is so sad. Especially since we live in such a rural area and other choices are not readily available. If this hospital thinks that banning VBAC is helping women, they are dead wrong. Those that want it will be forced to labor at home which obviously in St. Peter's opinion would be more dangerous. So, if you are trying to help women PLEASE give them choices.Flag
-
156
Name: Tasha Fligge on May 3, 2010Comments: I was being induced with my first child, too much Pitocin and things went south from there I had to have an emergency cesarean which was completely against my birth plan, but I had no other choice to save my son's ife. I would love to be able to have a VBAC my 2nd time around. With my c-section I was in more pain than imaginable, almost one of the work experiences I have been through. Shouldn't I have the choice to determine the way I want to be able to bring my children into this world. Why are they so against VBACs if I was a Emergency cesarean???Flag
-
157
Name: Lisa Kendall on Oct 5, 2011Comments:Flag
-
158
Name: Carly Evansky on Apr 19, 2013Comments:Flag
-
159
Name: Melissa Pate on Apr 19, 2013Comments:Flag