Signatures 240 total
-
1
Name: Anton Gabrielson on Apr 23, 2010Comments: This transportation corridor will open Montana up to more oil companies coming through, and coal companies are interested in equipment operations on the route that could supply eastern Montana mining operations. As a Missoulian concerned about the effects of climate change and poor energy planning on the future in Montana, I oppose the oil sands and their dirty corridor through our city and state. Our taxes would be contributing to companies that do not pay U.S taxes and who degrade environments around the world in the name of short term profit and global oil addiction. I wholeheartedly encourage my Montanan citizens, senators, and governor to push investment in programs that will make alternative energy viable and affordable over time, in addition to contributing to Montana’s economy. Montana can be at the forefront of solar and wind energy investment, manufacturing, and installation, instead of being on the short end of the stick in relation to unsustainable oil conglomerates. Anton GabrielsonFlag
-
2
Name: Amber McDermott on Apr 23, 2010Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Marty Cobenais on Apr 23, 2010Comments: Don't allow these shipments to occur. It will only destry the environment more. If these have an "Accident" along the way it will create a large problem. If you build out the roads more it will affect the eco-system of the rivers it follows. DON"T ALLOW THESE SHIPMENTS TO HAPPEN!!!!!!!! Is that Clear?Flag
-
4
Name: Eileen Newton on Apr 23, 2010Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Sarah on Apr 23, 2010Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: John Kemmick on Apr 23, 2010Comments: The Tar Sands are the dirtiest form of energy on earth. Why would we want that dug up?Flag
-
7
Name: Shawn MacGregor on Apr 24, 2010Comments: Shame on the greed exemplified by the Tar Sands Project, with no regard for the health of Mother Earth or local indigenous communities!Flag
-
8
Name: Neil M. Bennett on Apr 24, 2010Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Zachary Brown on Apr 24, 2010Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Stephanie Olszewski on Apr 25, 2010Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Patrick Rhea on Apr 25, 2010Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Peter Burns on Apr 26, 2010Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Anonymous on Apr 26, 2010Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Yaicha Bookhout on Apr 26, 2010Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Barbara Hall on Apr 26, 2010Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Prairie Wolfe on Apr 26, 2010Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Sarah McClain on Apr 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Alysha Scott on Apr 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Janelle Corn on Apr 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Andy Cagle on Apr 28, 2010Comments: I will personally stand in front of this convoy as it passes through Missoula.. Lets commit to a barricade that stops the very first shipment... The world will thank us!!!Flag
-
21
Name: Georgia Milan M.D. on Apr 28, 2010Comments: As a member of Physicians for Social Responsibility, I am very aware of the health risks of the Tar Sands Mining. Also, I oppose the highway proposed which will cause environmental damage and ultimately human health implications. I strongly oppose the road construction and tar sands mining. Georgia Milan M.D.Flag
-
22
Name: CARL BASNER on Apr 29, 2010Comments: STOP FURTHER CLIMATE DESTRUCTION AND THE TRANSPORTATION OF THESE PRODUCTS AND TRUCKS THRU MONTANA AND MISSOULA,MTFlag
-
23
Name: John Frakie on Apr 29, 2010Comments: Stop this madness before Western Montana's scenic byways are destroyed along with severe cutting of trees for massive "turnouts" that must be built to handle the montrous Kearl Oil Sands equipment's for stopping points along the way at regular intervals. There is a waterway, (a river or stream) beside most of the byways this transfer of mining equipment may cause to be rerouted and polluted destroying a century of careful stewardship of Montana's Fish and Wildlife Folks. We must say "NO" now to protect the environment and scenic beauty that will be inherited by our children and many others that LOVE this most precious part of the world. If we stay quiet now and allow this to occur, we will be remembered as the adults that allowed this calamity to happen. That is not how Western Montanans want to be remembered.Flag
-
24
Name: Matti Sand on Apr 29, 2010Comments: The intrinsic health and beauty of the Lochsa River canyon is worth more than any short-term economic gains we as individuals, local, state or federal governments or any oil company might gain.Flag
-
25
Name: Krystal Weilage on Apr 29, 2010Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2010Comments: Let's not help with the destruction of Alberta! Make the SOBs find another way if they must do the project.Flag
-
27
Name: Amber McDermott on May 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Mariah A. Rees on May 4, 2010Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Cameron Murphey on May 5, 2010Comments: When is enough enough? Now.Flag
-
30
Name: Marguerite Jodry on May 6, 2010Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Martha Crago on May 7, 2010Comments: I'm opposed to the Tar Sands project. As a member of the Missoula community, I strongly oppose allowing the huge trucks come through our state/county/city. I urge all public representatives to oppose this transportation route.Flag
-
32
Name: Carla Green on May 7, 2010Comments: Bad news all the way around.Flag
-
33
Name: Richard Pence on May 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Landon Means on May 8, 2010Comments: This is shady- we need more time to read this and be a part of the decision process. This is not alternative fuels!!! WE NEED MORE TIME TO READ AND DISCUSS THIS-OUR LAND IS FINITE AND GREED IS NOT THE WAY!!!Flag
-
35
Name: Justine Davis on May 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Adam Schuff on May 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Ann U Smith on May 12, 2010Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Jessica Crago on May 13, 2010Comments: I live in montana, was born and raised here, and do not agree with the efforts to use our highways to transport huge equipment to Canada (which will negatively impact our ability to drive those same roads). I am strongly against the involvement with the Tar Sand Mining operation and encourage my state to represent my, and others, opposition.Flag
-
39
Name: Brett Haverstick on May 13, 2010Comments: I am completely and utterly against this project. Not only does it completely fly in the face of our global climate crisis, but it also threatens our wild & scenic landscape here in Idaho. This project needs to be stopped.Flag
-
40
Name: John Darnell on May 14, 2010Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Nicoline Rickard on May 14, 2010Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Anonymous on May 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Rael Nidess, M.D. on May 21, 2010Comments: I oppose anything & everything that promotes the exploitation of Tar Sands. I cannot imagine any human endeavor that more accurately depicts the adage "Digging One's Own Grave".Flag
-
44
Name: RICHARD DOWNING on May 21, 2010Comments: Do not allow this equipment to be transported on highway 12 thru Idaho. There is no excuse for this equipment on a wild and sceinic river/ wilderness corridor. It will disrupt our tourist trafic on an extreamly dangerous highway, as well as our daily use of highway 12. NO TO THIS PROJECT ON HIGHWAY 12!!Flag
-
45
Name: Christine Holbert on May 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Lanie Johnson on May 21, 2010Comments: Both the equipment transport and the Tar Sands mining project are not only extremely destructive to our environment, they are also very expensive. Also, the Tar Sands project is expected to last a long time. Clearly a few people would make a lot of money out of this madness. Now is the time for us all to learn that life is more important than money!Flag
-
47
Name: William & Doris Gerhart on May 21, 2010Comments: If Canada wants this stuff, they should haul it through THEIR country. Fix their highway so its passable for these trucks.Flag
-
48
Name: Dawn Serra on May 21, 2010Comments: Safety and the environment should not be compromised just so a corporation can make a few more bucks. Please don't allow this project to go forward.Flag
-
49
Name: Sarah Stock on May 21, 2010Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Cecelia Woods on May 21, 2010Comments:Flag