| # | First Name | Last Name | Country | Comments |
|---|
| 201 | Michaela | Cordes | US | |
| 202 | laura | hindley | UK | sickos |
| 203 | Dan | Wood | US | |
| 204 | Michael | Lengel | US | So called "Star Wars" technology and and defense systems are useless at this point. They serve no purpose in the context of a "war on terror" because "terrorists" do not have/use missiles. The only function a project like this would/could serve is to allow for defense corporations to overcharge and profit from a nonfuctional defense plan. |
| 205 | jan | taylor | UK | |
| 206 | Francesca | Fryer | UK | |
| 207 | Angela | Wood | UK | |
| 208 | Brian | Madican | UK | |
| 209 | F | Counts | UK | Missile Defense is an unworkable, unnecessary and very expensive system, it should not have any support here or anywhere. |
| 210 | Sam | Beaton | UK | |
| 211 | Ava | Morgenstern | US | |
| 212 | Kathryn | Evans | UK | |
| 213 | Jamie | Worsfold | UK | |
| 214 | Karl | Naylor | UK | |
| 215 | David | Reed | UK | |
| 216 | Paul | van Duuren | NL | there's absolutely no point in throwing money into a devil's pit. |
| 217 | Harmen | Snoeijs | NL | |
| 218 | Joel | Brusk | US | A WASTE OF TIME, MONEY AND THE ENVIRONMENT. NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!! |
| 219 | jack | gain | UK | |
| 220 | annette | hudspeth | UK | No US missiles on UK soil |
| 221 | Neil | Bye | UK | US missiles again
Was Greenham for nothing? |
| 222 | Jonty | Bouskill | UK | |
| 223 | Elizabeth | Horvath | US | |
| 224 | Rachael | Bailey | UK | |
| 225 | Devon | Nuckles | US | |
| 226 | Nye | Hughes | UK | |
| 227 | Rachel | Schmidt | US | |
| 228 | lallias | sophie | FR | |
| 229 | naoko | yokota | JP | |
| 230 | Heather | Goad | US | |
| 231 | Marty | Loiselle | US | spaced |
| 232 | alison | pinkney | | |
| 233 | Christopher | Davis | UK | |
| 234 | Rex | VanStee | US | everyday i wake up im reminded how stupid our adminitration here in america is, the only way to stop them is to do somthing. if you dont they'll win. and thease people are fucking crazy |
| 235 | Gillian | Luke | UK | |
| 236 | James | Kleiner | US | |
| 237 | Jessica | Ince | UK | |
| 238 | matt | loftiss | | Why?...
This is a bit abstract. Aren’t they suppose to defend the UK – as opposed to attacking other countries - I LOVE the UK, and I'm sorry that the jackass that is running the US is such a knob, but are you protesting the deployment of the missiles in the UK, or is this just a "fuck the capitalist Americans thing"? I got this off a Radiohead link, and they don’t explain why you’re doing this. If you give me a good reason for why I should be upset at “the deployment of missile defense interceptor missiles in the UK, or anywhere else, I can be a good advocate for your cause. I just don’t understand why this is something you’ve taken issue with.
Thanks,
Matt |
| 239 | Zarina | Bhatia | UK | There is enough poverty and disaster in Sudan, Bangladesh and consequences of War that was in Iraq. Why then??? |
| 240 | Brian | Stumbaugh | US | LOVE and PEACE is the only way.
|
| 241 | Michael | Brown | UK | |
| 242 | michael | tucker | US | it's just not right to try and play "god" |
| 243 | Thomas | Marta | FR | |
| 244 | Chris | Brown | UK | |
| 245 | Lucia | Caruso | AR | |
| 246 | thomas | redstone | UK | the very idea is stupid! leave wars in space to film makers! |
| 247 | katherine | ward | UK | |
| 248 | w | ottman | US | |
| 249 | Amy | Read | UK | I am glad that my attention has been drawn to this. It would seem in yet another way, government shows such little regard for the voice of the people in who's best interest it is there to govern. I think that it sees its role as that of parent and not caretaker and this is a great shame. |
| 250 | freddie | mason | UK | |
