Signatures 271 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »
-
51
Name: Anonymous on Mar 24, 2006Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: Anonymous on Mar 24, 2006Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Anonymous on Mar 24, 2006Comments:Flag
-
54
Name: Kristin Baumgartner on Mar 25, 2006Comments:Flag
-
55
Name: Barbie Riva on Mar 25, 2006Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Grant Riva on Mar 25, 2006Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Riley Myklebust on Mar 25, 2006Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Jeremy Day on Mar 25, 2006Comments: Please do not allow Wal-mart to build a new store on the South HillFlag
-
59
Name: Kate Hellenthal on Mar 25, 2006Comments: No WalMart on the South Hill!Flag
-
60
Name: Cheryl Saucier-Wilson on Mar 26, 2006Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Maureen McGuire on Mar 26, 2006Comments: PLEASE don't let WalMart in to ruin our neighborhood and community!Flag
-
62
Name: Helen Franciscovich on Mar 27, 2006Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: Natalie Gulsrud on Mar 27, 2006Comments: smart development does not include a super walmart. Keep the southhill going in the right direction!Flag
-
64
Name: Sharon Grunwald on Mar 27, 2006Comments:Flag
-
65
Name: Richard Lewis on Mar 27, 2006Comments:Flag
-
66
Name: Lauris Anderson on Mar 28, 2006Comments: Absolutely think having a Walmart in the proposed location is insane.....traffic problems, right in the midst of a residential area.....on a wetland.... not to mention so close to 2 schools-Adams Elementary and Ferris HS.Flag
-
67
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2006Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2006Comments: I absolutely do not want a Wal-Mart anywhere on the south hill. Put in a Target Store that will give back to the community in stead of a Wal-Mart that will crush it and make traffic unbearable.Flag
-
69
Name: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2006Comments: I believe the arterial can hardly handle the amount of traffic that "flies by" our schools and playgrounds at the present! Don't believe that Wal-mart is building for the good of the community--the only ones who benifit are the ones with mega cash already in their banks, while the owners of smaller businesses dry up and blow away from the community that THEY helped build (I've been there first hand) Keep fighting and don't let Wal mart over run Spokane communities!Flag
-
70
Name: Cassandra Gifford on Mar 29, 2006Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Robin Rohwer on Mar 30, 2006Comments: I am in the Food Business. Walmart doesn't use very many local suppliers. I have people from here to Billings and Walmart is every bad thing that is said about them.Flag
-
72
Name: Tod Wallace on Mar 30, 2006Comments: walmart is not a neighborhood store, no matter what their pr people say.spokane would benefit from more walkable communities, not more stores that increase car traffic.Flag
-
73
Name: Virginia Murphy on Mar 31, 2006Comments: Would create to much traffic , especially around the high school and element. school. The increased traffic will pose a danger to the children.Flag
-
74
Name: Jerome Sweet on Apr 1, 2006Comments: How many Walmart's do we really need in Spokane Three is more than enough.Flag
-
75
Name: Anonymous on Apr 2, 2006Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: B Renda McIntire on Apr 2, 2006Comments:Flag
-
77
Name: Brittany Hickman on Apr 3, 2006Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Sharon Carson on Apr 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
79
Name: Mark T. Anderson on Apr 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Anonymous on Apr 6, 2006Comments: we don't need a wal-mart on the south hill. Our traffic is already far to heavy and getting worse.Flag
-
81
Name: Dennis Baird on Apr 7, 2006Comments: ANYTHING, but Walmart!....look at the top 20 people with more money than they can spend....Walmart silverspoon offspring represent (last I saw) 5 offspring!Flag
-
82
Name: Tammy Baird on Apr 7, 2006Comments: How much local business will close!Flag
-
83
Name: Stefanie Baird on Apr 7, 2006Comments: NO, NO, NO!!!!!Flag
-
84
Name: Samantha Baird on Apr 7, 2006Comments: Build it and they will NOT come!!!!Flag
-
85
Name: Anonymous on Apr 7, 2006Comments: NO WALMART ON SPOKANE SOUTH HILL !!!!Flag
-
86
Name: Anonymous on Apr 7, 2006Comments: NO WALMART ON SPOKANE SOUTH HILL !!!!Flag
-
87
Name: Anonymous on Apr 7, 2006Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: Lisa Raine Lewison on Apr 8, 2006Comments: Former South Hill residentFlag
-
89
Name: Leona Dater on Apr 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Anonymous on Apr 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: Kimberly Yahne on Apr 9, 2006Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: Lindsey McLean on Apr 9, 2006Comments: The South Hill is a nice place to live specifically because it has not been completely destroyed by monstrosities like Wal Mart and strip malls. Let's try to keep it that way.Flag
-
93
Name: Anonymous on Apr 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Tammy Baird on Apr 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Maureen Ramos on Apr 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
96
Name: Anonymous on Apr 11, 2006Comments:Flag
-
97
Name: Tamela Trout on Apr 11, 2006Comments: I believe that allowing a Wal-Mart on the proposed site at 44th and Regal would create a traffic situation that the existing roads and surrounding businesses could not handle.Flag
-
98
Name: Kristopher Trout on Apr 11, 2006Comments: No!!Flag
-
99
Name: Larry Swartz on Apr 12, 2006Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Matt Bahr on Apr 13, 2006Comments:Flag