We the undersigned believe that the introduction of shootouts as a method to determine the winners of NCAA Division I hockey games is an affront to the integrity of the sport. We say: A 65 minute sporting contest which ends in a tie is a valid result. It means that neither team deserved to win and neither team deserved to lose. Introducing a measure which utilizes a minor (albeit exciting) aspect of the competition directly threatens the integrity of the game we love. A one-on-one contest between a shooter and a goaltender is an event in the normal play of a game which occurs infrequently enough to make it wholly unrepresentative of the game. Using such an infrequent event as a representation of the whole contest is pure folly. We must therefore decry its inclusion in our game. We ask: That those entrusted to nurture our favorite sport through their administration give exceptional consideration (in light of our beliefs) when deciding the future of this potential change to the game we love.
No comments yet.join the discussion
Al Haugen, United States5 years ago Comments: To let it come down to so few players on a team determining the outcome of a hard faught game is ludicrous!
Tim Lufkin, United States6 years ago
Steve, United States6 years ago Internet Alias (if any): fetch
Comments: Shootouts are terrible. Give teams a chance to settle the game the right way.
There are no highlights yet.