Virgin Radio ads in Ottawa must come down!

Signatures 539 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 11 › »

1. 201
   Name: Catherine Sinclair on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments: These ads are shameful and a disgrace to women.

   Flag
2. 202
   Name: Heather Ritchie on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 203
   Name: Sven Johnson on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments: As a 21 year old guy, I find this ad disgusting! In roman times, an army would rape the women of the city they took over, as a sign of dominating and defeating the city. You will not dominate or take over this city. You will not impregnate us (the young people) with your music or morals.

   Flag
4. 204
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 205
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 206
   Name: Patti Ellis on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 207
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 208
   Name: Robert Schoenholz on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments: Please remove these inappropriate, sexist ads.

   Flag
9. 209
   Name: Chantal Schoenholz on Feb 2, 2009

   Comments: Take them down!

   Flag
10. 210
    Name: Margot Bowen on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 211
    Name: Alexis Porter on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 212
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: women are not just value for their reproductive systems

    Flag
13. 213
    Name: Brian Raychaba on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: I found these ads offensive.

    Flag
14. 214
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 215
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: Hi, You people have gotta take this ad off the streets of our BELOVED capital!

    Flag
16. 216
    Name: Shafena Smith on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 217
    Name: Renee C on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 218
    Name: Renee Francoeur on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 219
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 220
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 221
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: Depictable and insulting to our daughters and husbands. Please remove these very offensive adds.

    Flag
22. 222
    Name: Peter Melvin on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: These adds are an insult to all humanity.

    Flag
23. 223
    Name: A Virgin Mobile Customer on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 224
    Name: Marcel Turcot on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 225
    Name: Francesca Dagenais on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: I am offended by these ads. Please remove them now.

    Flag
26. 226
    Name: Francesca Dagenais on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: I am offended by these ads. Please remove them now.

    Flag
27. 227
    Name: Fernand Dagenais on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: I am against such ads

    Flag
28. 228
    Name: Jessica Dennis on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 229
    Name: Ina Major on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 230
    Name: Sarah Peek on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: Virgin celebrates these for being "controversial" but why should we celebrate "controversy" when it serves only to further condone the subjugation and control of certain persons, in this case women That the city of Ottawa continues to allow these ads to stand is just one more way they have demonstrated disregard for the well-being of the people in this city. The city has an imperative responsibility for the immediate removal of these ads from our city streets.

    Flag
31. 231
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 232
    Name: Nikoo Boroumand on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 233
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 234
    Name: Ivana on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 235
    Name: Victoria Cheong on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 236
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 237
    Name: Lieran Docherty on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 238
    Name: Carmelina Martino on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: This day and age people should use their common sense and own marality when addressing the public and therefore not using all women to fall under "sexual objects" and to respct the individual for ones intellect not body. An instituion should have better sense then to profit by this type of propaganda and not expect any moral being to allow such distaste in advertising to go on or to even succeed.

    Flag
39. 239
    Name: Melinda Lively on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 240
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: the ads wouldnt be so bad if they didnt have pregnant women... it is promoting unsafe sex

    Flag
41. 241
    Name: Reyn Lauer on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 242
    Name: Lynda Richardson on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: Very inappropriate - get with the polically and socially correct program!

    Flag
43. 243
    Name: Christina Crook on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: These ads are sexist and inappropriate. Please remove them.

    Flag
44. 244
    Name: Nate Warden on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: All the 5 points listed above seem to make a lot of sense to me, I am actually appalled that anyone would go about making such a sexist advertisement and then produce/post it publicly.

    Flag
45. 245
    Name: John Currie on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: I find these ads offensive to my four daughters. I suggests that they have no virtues and neither do the men that they associate with.

    Flag
46. 246
    Name: John Makadi on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 247
    Name: Jolene Koornneef on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 248
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 249
    Name: Samantha Cascagnette on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments: The "gods of rock" gives the messages that older men have impregnated these young girls, also the look of misery on these girls faces makes it appear that their pregnancies were against their will and this sends a message supporting pedophilia. What kind of a city do we live in if this is the message in our media Mass media has a responsibility to portray a message that is respectful.

    Flag
50. 250
    Name: Alex Marshall on Feb 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 11 › »